All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm tree
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:27:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao2mNbsvmROAna2V@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfa3xML+PJK0242GiHs1warwSrf4ikN4wTTtwOUdFazhRw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 3:33 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-x86 tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   15a9a2ba0c546 ("Merge tag 'kvm-x86-selftests2-7.3' of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux into HEAD")
> >
> > from the kvm tree and commit:
> >
> >   12c2a7f18f579 ("Merge branch 'selftests2'")
> >
> > from the kvm-x86 tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> 
> Thanks, this is just a small difference in how I fixed the conflict
> between multiple kvm-x86 pull requests. Either version is fine, and
> Sean will force-push to Linus's tree at some point anyway.

I force-pushed using kvm/next, so this should go away.  Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 13:33 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm tree Mark Brown
2026-08-25 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-08-25 14:27   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-12 14:08 Mark Brown
2026-02-12 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-02-12 15:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-17  3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-12  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-20  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-20 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao2mNbsvmROAna2V@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.