Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] bundle: get (mostly) rid of `the_repository`

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > Refactor "bundle.c" so that we don't depend on `the_repository` anymore.
> > This conversion is trivial for most of the part, as we already have a
> > repository available in all calling conexts.
> >
> > The only exception is that we use `get_log_output_encoding()`, which
> > implicitly depends on `the_repository`. Add an `extern` declaration for
> > this function so that we can drop `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE` and not
> > accidentally introduce more uses of `the_repository`.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> > ---
> >  bundle.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> > index b64716f252..a9330bf0d3 100644
> > --- a/bundle.c
> > +++ b/bundle.c
> > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> > -#define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> >  #define DISABLE_SIGN_COMPARE_WARNINGS
> >  
> >  #include "git-compat-util.h"
> > @@ -21,6 +20,13 @@
> >  #include "connected.h"
> >  #include "write-or-die.h"
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * NEEDSWORK: this function implicitly depends on `the_repository` and is not
> > + * available because we dropped USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE. We can remove the
> > + * declaration once it's accessible via `repo_config_values`.
> > + */
> > +extern const char *get_log_output_encoding(void);
> > +
> 
> Doesn't this defeat the whole "drop #define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> as a mark that we are done with this file and no longer need to
> worry about it going forward because we won't be able to compile if
> somebody adds a new use?" premise?

Yes and no. By removing the define early it allows us to not reintroduce
new references to `the_repository` by accident, but carve out a single
exception for one of the functions that still depends on it. The
alternative would be to not do that, and if so there is no guarantee
whatsoever that we won't introduce more references to `the_repository`
in this file.

So I'm still leaning towards keeping this as-is, but I don't feel very
strongly about this. Let me know in case that argument doesn't sway you
and I'll adapt.

Thanks!

Patrick