From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C1839EF2E; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787145724; cv=none; b=NVXto5y6sM6C3lL2wS0SIYK1cCAMEwRorFftY/k2Dcl++PEIDLbELGC5Sy5/wPQu2AjjnLnHDSBYZOLxQeg99GJr5j/sguQl1L3ekWUu2XBpHgtFDAE4kL0XpPcPGvkWdS8OaOfn+9XlPhNpBk7KZNyTYZCU+5VV2bAB+09QAjw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787145724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Vdmjpn8CJfMnQfRyr/MDrWY2FC+TlXkCwh1vl6I1vr8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hFAqd7K8sZwvgxpRmba9rMmL0LXwOkQ0DlVRD8LZgXWlCKtO8A29KJ1mOIbRS2eryRSiY0NF7HsQB6B8OnrQ8q1wsxRGzqeggHuEaqpVDocF+JWtXzETfch0sgbOII09dNb4WyU+jgFTD2OceMNb+SC3DMZNlzArnnb0eeHLu4E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=HNw4xfsp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="HNw4xfsp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1787145716; x=1818681716; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Vdmjpn8CJfMnQfRyr/MDrWY2FC+TlXkCwh1vl6I1vr8=; b=HNw4xfspXU5ypM5bVZZ1zjHYRdYkvGRwagpHZag/4bxRtgOfDnhsSm50 5Nszd2W+MA+qKydGwbCt3LIZ4pXpZw0h1C5OnH/BPBiJkoBvGh6fWPdPR a1gDRhpyH6FkEomi1FFT5iwGwganUEuEyQoZEyk1/gRaP/uIFoP9zfCLk koTRSzZNMBUKTlUsGEjLfZCMbpw2MYrIOCV0IHLzsqoB0r+adfTQDYlnE CvvL/NQxzzFC1r0hgamDyeDV1yVzP9HS5tv43VXemG9G4CgSe/aPBoA81 v0DMqpHS68yhGP1ehHVZ68M3Tl93AGAohgYR8FqeJUY52sRO7j6eIKYD5 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aBMzzhGqTRazw45ZxbgDtg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hSKwgQ0HSiW01HN6Kbx1gw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11879"; a="98251581" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="98251581" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 06:21:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jMvKzqgVTVO1clvLqCfE1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uaYxJtA5R4GHVrsSflNZxg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,231,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="262296743" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.106]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2026 06:21:46 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:21:43 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Taha Ed-Dafili <0rayn.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, jic23@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@analog.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, robh@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iio: dac: ad5504: remove legacy platform data support Message-ID: References: <20260819082221.11227-1-0rayn.dev@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260819082221.11227-1-0rayn.dev@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 04:22:21AM -0400, Taha Ed-Dafili wrote: > > This breaks the case with dummy regulators as far as I can see. > > Has this been discussed in the previous rounds? > > Yes, David Lechner suggested in v3 to follow the pattern in > adc/ti-ads7950.c. Patch 3 is an intermediate state. Patch 5 replaces > this block with ACPI_COMPANION() fork. But this is still a runtime bisectability issue. Not critical most likely, but still... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko