From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net-next
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:34:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aobYTLPoIDiwLEhh@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eeb04db2-3c08-4b4d-97a0-02e418ed2537@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 12:26:33PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 8/19/26 11:50 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > TLDR; I can post new v2 for this PR if needed, the left-over of
> > LIST_HEAD(set_update_list) in patch #6 is a bit embarrasing from
> > cosmetic standpoint because I will need a oneliner patch to remove it.
> > And I can re-target to net.git as Paolo already mentioned.
> >
> > Anything else can be addressed by follow ups.
>
> Note that we are waiting for Linus to pull the net-next PR, so we have
> to wait a little more to process this one.
>
> WRT report, I think follow-ups are preferable where possible and really
> reduce pressure on the ML, but if _you prefer_ a v2 please go ahead.
Let's just follow up then.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 23:29 [PATCH net-next 0/8] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] netfilter: validate L4 headers after userspace packet writes Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-20 19:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] netfilter: ipset: remove need to allocate memory on delete operations Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] netfilter: nf_tables: don't queue packet path object notifications Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] netfilter: nf_conntrack_expect: consolidate check for insertion of dead expectation Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] netfilter: ctnetlink: do not expose expectation DEAD flag Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netfilter: nf_tables: move set_update_list to nftables per-netns Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] netfilter: nf_tables: call set ops .commit when building new ruleset blob Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-17 23:29 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] ipvs: fix integer overflow in ftp helper port/address parsing Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-18 13:18 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net-next Paolo Abeni
2026-08-19 0:04 ` Florian Westphal
2026-08-19 21:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-20 10:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-20 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aobYTLPoIDiwLEhh@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.