From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8125C79F89 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 07:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1410615.1641415 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x3UBT-0000Sf-6Z; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:31 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1410615.1641415; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x3UBT-0000SY-2z; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:31 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1410615; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:29 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x3UBR-0000SS-Qi for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:29 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x3UBQ-0036KC-12; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:28 +0000 Received: from 224.pool85-54-217.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.217.224] helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x3UBQ-00F9Mb-2X; Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:54:28 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=TjaK1aNsxcIM7rgTT/kjgetUHqMwYgfVRiGkAesnSd0=; b=h/LnFSj72cNOcv7NmV0usANS3m ZyigNSP672EM/0ywWcvAuJG3YS678hnuxG15HQMttVuXTCGeYdzCKUiOjD8Sz+o1Fuo4By6r3/pY/ HuQPF+h43FtmXhPnNfVkzmkbdd5i0O/TF+mmio+9nCnhLyyZfWwQoqlWuk7QDw6sBaYs=; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:54:06 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Nicola Vetrini , Andrew Cooper , Teddy Astie Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] x86/altcall: hide casting away of const Message-ID: References: <0ff5676d-2ad3-49e3-a94b-90e7c3edb55f@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 08:32:09AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > ALT_CALL_PTR() really means to get rid of const (when necessary, i.e. when > used from apply_alt_calls()): We want to patch the original call site, > after all, and memory-wise that's unrelated to the struct alt_call * that > we start from. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger.