From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDC52C61DC4 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6807960825; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjaMmuq1rFZW; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buildroot.org; s=default; t=1787861848; bh=mPkIfowrxTiiF6tyXdkyjFNxV8UdpCbcNbQW7b78z3Q=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=izbh5IYVpaxJcbet2CQjeQN0ozIwrLF7rnQOpXgwo48DLai5CetKxdRkE372YK7Ar Tt1RjOmVs6OUIgc9mgymfX60kWJ30DgHjNDfrP8g4A5dm5a8fA0UoysfhQzrScnLrh +hDp/eYWg3kF08C3lNhRpJGUu24JfLmrzMDpaI3p1ppIPcJinCOq7bVegIHw+XWdNO uW3Bz9nrBzUezFyYAbr+L6pbv9b4PqrE+oN4C3XqUbTjbb7A3rDKKQLEAWa3PuKPZT KYRCD3ofQ+Tg09STmhRVm/nF8oGZM77cv2BtDSCKdJRXYuSthGOKslvDo9GUviLBl2 QGc4YuA3UFAAg== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9E36070B; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7137B2C for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD65040697 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id YeofN4NGInSY for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=185.246.85.4; helo=smtpout-03.galae.net; envelope-from=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com; receiver= Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3CB405FF for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09D54E413E6 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0DA05FFF4; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 186C111C78023; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:17:18 +0200 To: Thomas Perale Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Message-ID: References: <20260827173328.8765-1-thomas.perale@mind.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260827173328.8765-1-thomas.perale@mind.be> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] utils/genrandconfig: always use BR2_BACKUP_SITE in the autobuilders X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 07:33:28PM +0200, Thomas Perale wrote: > Yes that's what I meant. Since doing this verification by the autobuilders is > an issue you could move the verification and publishing of the stale entries > from the machine hosting the sources. > > Since it already has the responsability to download all the entries, it seems > like a perfect candidate to detect stale locations. > Unless 'update-br-mirror' script only trigger a the download if a new location > is detected ? It does "make source" so it only triggers a download if the file is not already in the cache. And typically dead upstream servers are used to host dead projects, which don't see releases very often, and therefore we likely already have the tarball in our cache. > What I'm afraid of with the HTTP header solution proposed is that it's gonna be > burried in logs that would be quickly forgotten about. The current solution > while generating a lot of false positive manage to catch some real stale > locations publicly. True, but it's also generating a lot of noise. To be honest, I am not 100% sure my proposal is the best solution, but if we're aiming to reduce the number of build failures, dropping false positives is important. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot