From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A93822FF641 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787877064; cv=none; b=DyRukG0K0/a9lEy1AnlKWhiH6p4S6V2EZu67uDVj27LmRnrypSUBSS37D50IeCib10Q3U3x/xAVTnLHJkslpU1vvL34PQuRzeRMHtUodH45fAi9jBMg+gWZN/j2QHMjOasDMDK5/NdlCm9Xi4Sq6M2UJI4b6w5rbTJkM15YKL0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787877064; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oA8sAaa/jH2R/w3faL78TjLNauUiN5YfoM8pTI6SLG0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZDOtFYdjHgPkbQjbbDTlAcTjMcrunTqVuZGw2SpHj641ogRXWkIGBPrftHTychEqsX3RLg1jfPTicNfPc4Nea1oUbIVlhhX4xLVKHEAYg8rbHLavApskoWsDYmrO0kunByI+oqcg7HTFf1kYlU/XjSkuJMQ7GTT8cBxEV36/Y8k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JZ5hXzKR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JZ5hXzKR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5BB01F000E9; Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:31:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787877063; bh=unJCwCv6aT4wKksfMJXQ6zefLmTy/GHaDQqqj5GJg90=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=JZ5hXzKRVIBRe3FVsHcEdGg2M5rtOwLeIMaQMu+7Smy0IMuPcGz52SVey207ks4h0 bPYnMUi95JBqYKWmQngO+aAaYdlgz0YtAQ9e1C8ve8euxjmi13iJlMzcMUGpnoxw0z 9TcpVC/bYKKX8gOWMAq2SuGJCXcX4q2CjmDQV4XrQeK0JNm+x2S7xEa5sff+Ec4a9b cPZmrH3o8UG0pRsq58/wcISxgwQm9ZlX+chRgKBcSVgWLltWTIA3YZd9a70ECYtTVQ +Vr5dV41CCQzd2fCw7sAsBcQ6BzSaCSu38rRWOYSXhXfscmxXipTLqSNHtObsM0o4O D9ph5cO5bB//w== Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:31:01 -0700 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Yafang Shao Cc: jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 for-next 5/8] selftests/livepatch: Adapt atomic replace tests to provides/obsoletes Message-ID: References: <20260825114641.80452-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <20260825114641.80452-6-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: live-patching@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260825114641.80452-6-laoar.shao@gmail.com> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 07:46:38PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > The legacy "replace" field in struct klp_patch was replaced by the > provides/obsoletes mechanism. As a result, the atomic replace > selftests fail to build against kernels that only support > provides/obsoletes. Then wouldn't the test failure be working as designed? -- Josh