All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	 Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	 Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 kexec@lists.infradead.org, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, rmikey@meta.com, riel@surriel.com,
	 kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: record hardware-poisoned frames into the poisoned-memory table
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 15:11:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apGWUWi5-RbhFHpe@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826-hwpoison-kho-v3-3-6f79c4b605bc@debian.org>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 05:03:54AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/poison.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/poison.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..d6855e712832c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/poison.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Runtime side of the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY table: one bit per
> + * EFI_POISON_UNIT_SIZE, set here as frames go bad, honored by the next kernel.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2026 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
> + * Copyright (c) 2026 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "efi: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <linux/memblock.h>

Is it leftover? I don't see any memblock usage.

> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> +
> +static struct linux_efi_poisoned_memory *efi_poison __ro_after_init;
> +static u64 efi_poison_nbits __ro_after_init;
> +
> +static u64 __init
> +efi_poison_usable_size(const struct linux_efi_poisoned_memory *pm)
> +{
> +	u64 nr_units = DIV_ROUND_UP(PFN_PHYS(max_pfn), pm->unit_size);
> +	u64 bytes = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_units, BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +
> +	/* Whole words: the bitmap is reached an unsigned long at a time. */
> +	return min(round_up(bytes, sizeof(unsigned long)), pm->size);

Hm. Why bother to clamp to max_pfn? What's what's wrong with just using
pm->size directly?

> +}
> +

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-28 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26 12:03 [PATCH v3 0/5] efi: mm/memory-failure: keep hardware-poisoned pages out of the next kexec Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: add the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY configuration table Breno Leitao
2026-08-28 13:47   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 14:27     ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm/memory-failure: libstub: install the poisoned-memory EFI table Breno Leitao
2026-08-28 13:59   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 14:47     ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: record hardware-poisoned frames into the poisoned-memory table Breno Leitao
2026-08-28 14:11   ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-09-07 15:23     ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/memory-failure: add a helper to poison a frame at boot Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: replay the poisioned page in the next kernel Breno Leitao
2026-08-28 14:35   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] efi: mm/memory-failure: keep hardware-poisoned pages out of the next kexec Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apGWUWi5-RbhFHpe@thinkstation \
    --to=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rmikey@meta.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.