All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Priyank Rathod <rathodpriyank@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@mailbox.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Fix struct pci_dev reference leak in aer_process_err_devices()
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:14:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <apSdOnbdLdrJ7ksF@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830-fix-aer-refcount-leak-v1-1-64e1013add12@google.com>

On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 08:28:28PM +0000, Priyank Rathod wrote:
> If is_error_source() matches a device purely by Requester/Completer ID
> match (e_info->id == pci_dev_id(dev)), the device is added to e_info->dev[]
> even if it lacks the AER extended capability (dev->aer_cap == 0).

Hallucination, we do not enable error reporting on devices without
AER capability, see pci_aer_init().

> Later, during aer_process_err_devices(), aer_get_device_error_info()
> returns 0 when dev->aer_cap is 0 (or if no active error status is read),

The "no active error status is read" is the only scenario where
this *could* happen.  However if no error bits are set in the
status register, why did the device send an error message upstream
in the first place?  That would be a broken device.

Another theoretical possibility would be that the device becomes
inaccessible by the time aer_get_device_error_info() reads the
status/mask registers.  They'd both be read as "all ones",
hence info->status & ~info->mask == 0.

> On the ID-match fast path (a), is_error_source() returns true without
> checking whether the device implements the AER extended capability
> (dev->aer_cap != 0). This creates a real, non-exotic situation in several
> common hardware topologies and operational states:

Hallucination, this is by no means "real, non-exotic",
it's an unlikely corner case.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-30 20:28 [PATCH] PCI/AER: Fix struct pci_dev reference leak in aer_process_err_devices() Priyank Rathod
2026-08-30 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 21:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-08-30 21:14 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-08-31  3:24   ` Priyank Rathod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=apSdOnbdLdrJ7ksF@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=rathodpriyank@google.com \
    --cc=stefan.roese@mailbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.