From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Esteban Blanc <eblanc@baylibre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
linux@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] iio: adc: ad4030: fix invalid oversampling_ratio validation
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:38:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apbhxUo6LTHH278l@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apayPCk4ln_Hh_Bb@ashevche-desk.local>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:08:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> > In ad4030_set_avg_frame_len(), the logarithm is calculated before input
> > validation. Passing zero or negative values leads to an undefined result
> > from ilog2().
> >
> > Validate that the input is strictly positive prior to computing its
> > logarithm to ensure only valid values are processed.
>
> ...
>
> > - if (avg_val < 0 || avg_val > ad4030_average_modes[last_avg_idx])
> > + if (avg_val <= 0 || avg_val > ad4030_average_modes[last_avg_idx])
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> I still find '<= 0' confusing. Why not check against 1?
> And I would rather see an additional comment.
I realize here it does not matter much but I tend to agree that the correct
check is against 1
>
> What about
>
> /* Reject unsupported modes */
> if (avg_val > ad4030_average_modes[last_avg_idx])
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Avoid invalid values for logarithm since it's undefined */
> if (avg_val < 1)
> // In this case, when condition is split, if (avg_val <= 0) is also possible
> return -EINVAL;
>
Also tend to agree with the above but no strong feeling.
- Nuno Sá
> > + avg_log2 = ilog2(avg_val);
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 10:42 [PATCH v4] iio: adc: ad4030: fix invalid oversampling_ratio validation Salah Triki
2026-09-01 11:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-01 14:38 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apbhxUo6LTHH278l@nsa \
--to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=eblanc@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@analog.com \
--cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.