From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netdevsim: add link speed support
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 10:01:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apeDXBASpPvAaWcG@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4892d03c-6493-4c1c-aaab-39d71ddf527b@lunn.ch>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > OK, here is the reason. In taprio_set_picos_per_byte(), it init NIC speed to
> > SPEED_10. If the NIC doesn't support get_link_ksettings, the final calculated
> > picos_per_byte would be a extremely large number 800000. The later tc taprio
> > testing `tc qdisc ... sched-entry S 02 300` will always failed in
> > fill_sched_entry(), as min_duration is also a large number 48000.
> >
> > After we supports get_link_ksettings for netdevsim, the speed is 5000 and
> > picos_per_byte will be init to 1600. The later min_duration checking in
> > fill_sched_entry() is 300 vs 96. So the tc qdisc command always return 0.
> >
> > To fix the test, I think we should reduce the interval number. e.g.
>
> Why not just set the initial speed to SPEED_10, so nothing changes?
>
`nsim_leaf_tx_share_set` and `nsim_leaf_tx_max_set` compare against
`NSIM_LINK_SPEED_MAX` for TX‑rate setting. Using `SPEED_10` as the value
appears too small. I am concerned this could break other existing tests.
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 3:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] netdevsim: add link speed support Hangbin Liu
2026-08-31 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] " Hangbin Liu
2026-08-31 12:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-01 6:39 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-01 12:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-02 1:53 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-02 12:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-31 12:24 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-01 6:31 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-08-31 22:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-01 6:58 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-01 8:23 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-01 14:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-02 2:01 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-09-02 12:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-01 14:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-31 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests: netdevsim: add speed testing Hangbin Liu
2026-08-31 22:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-01 6:42 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-01 15:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-02 2:04 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apeDXBASpPvAaWcG@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@kylinos.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.