From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3335CC61DD6 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:04:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ehHXm1EA15sH3PAgiH8YRUFi1V46PpThjqluKgx1aNk=; b=dDxv6eVbJ+a6vaDYw8Es757A2u kuL8dVMuoswNQR1ne1mj2P6+YArgK1rH2tmNbzZ7oduSCSTm9bKUt5gVTYBqADDUCBUww4/9LMumr Bha2Etx4nc+f7paZIYvSUbRtNIvkhpPhVOgNUqHRBsV8lgZaaCX0X4l+7rxrjNaRSewpqTm52crqZ AhKjbko/KuOZ3eGX1bovH82A0N6zWQDYoxAZMw00pAKBgCVGrth/1da8gPIbezOMzQMi6J0CisIIv evIxTA09o+nDIMeNG31OmVwLIY0m7sGfBLh9PXEnQArgWhr5Xv9d7/H3cgc7dT+bhVctLMJHrF+eZ Dp81WmQQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x1fxN-0000000E0hR-3cis; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:04:29 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x1fxM-0000000E0gn-1k8W for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:04:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7610F600C8; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D7B31F00A3A; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:04:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788336266; bh=ehHXm1EA15sH3PAgiH8YRUFi1V46PpThjqluKgx1aNk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Zh35Q2XzptRtprN1yUCr/I5u26AWu/2PrtLP4YmUeVqyM235/cQm1rm1vbz/05bew mH4bgWDc1CHFP4x/ZNKM0f85ky7wQFWWGQOv8RqNF/kAWdn4tUAYaS7sxXXFdEfpfZ NTKpvszME857KvGrWT2hRfouBnIavyuV6XMnIffii+1QfkVeEqRIT8ZvG5O7DCFNwC FdH2nh/B+PyP2IPxCNkfLn7Fo5YShbaH/pihDjOpNx8BgunPhwSjYEbp4TNBnRDtP+ LIxuKR/eWl1eWJWCrnXfcgS9+pSvCXCyBU1swsIMoft9ST1i03+387h8JcfQMwfKNx BUOwlt6FipT8A== Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:04:20 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Baoquan He Cc: David Matlack , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Dave Young , Alexander Graf Subject: Re: RFC: Enable Sashiko code reviews for kexec@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Baoquan, On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 01:52:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > On 09/02/26 at 07:34am, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 01:27:34PM -0700, David Matlack wrote: > > > Hi kexec@ mailing list and maintainers, > > > > > > I would like to enable Sashiko code reviews for patches sent to the > > > kexec mailing list. I have found it useful for patches I have sent and > > > reviewed on the kvm and linux-pci mailing lists, which have Sashiko > > > enabled. > > > > > > I sent a pull request to Sashiko to add kexec here: > > > > > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/474 > > > > diff --git a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > index e6e4fb57f..e9ad97708 100644 > > --- a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > +++ b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ reply_to_author = false > > cc_individuals = false > > cc = ["Chuck Lever ", "Jeff Layton ", "Anna Schumaker "] > > > > +[subsystems.kexec] > > +lists = ["kexec@lists.infradead.org"] > > +reply_to_author = true > > +send_positive_review = true > > > > Do we really want those? > > Some components don't want to CC list, then other people are welcome to > drop any comment during reviewing, while cc to maintainer and author > looks good to me. Just an input, no objection to any move. Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant do we really want extra emails saying sashiko is happy? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.