From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6C9C624D3 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:27:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=vbFyWlTlR2F3Q206BLfRPytzyVYTuzgJDU57OPpqTPk=; b=ZMWuj+yH8WIxj8Fq66GAFIcPcu Rq7Z/SnIRUv8NjAzNYmdOh4UwDlvjeWt/RHEuH6W0WrkM5Phb4xXFMiTpI5rIg8bxNAnGPYyhFa4D 8WQ9yHgp67FxVCDpr80dTDv2cBaLSOxbvkql/qCXgjNZXQyx9wjfw6CZ3CELnvsWuWuqJ1UhXRp9a CiO6NBTwbZNfWGNgczaXBSEi5X0tGQzx4UxvLqSBDcVFCKmyPOciN1W/9LlLtkQAzM8SR76wZ7BAU 6MsCZBkqyL/0/8hAzTyf53yG3YASf1C/pBKZSfBOirUg+Hu42S5Z5mDBVbue0x9OIQW82AmFFFEfU hGR6Efmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x1ojk-0000000FR00-3mXj; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:27:00 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x1oji-0000000FQzj-3YEb for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:26:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F99600D0; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22D451F00A3A; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788370017; bh=vbFyWlTlR2F3Q206BLfRPytzyVYTuzgJDU57OPpqTPk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ROekHXGCPrrzQZWI3zasZM5VxV6afXFrizBikSAODQqVPmR57vUdWiWRPYlkM1Fw5 NpUF6LU0yJ7kCg+/a9WDNOuhJB3MwcLr7WeRvUOGAdgTvRwwaO4evVRQ4EPpYVUfFM /b8cDQ32cT+pBebZwLTaMX6hLmsQ+BkYuWrhxG44tqoSmmk7asPVWyNAgccfxxYaDr epk7ilO4WW2c3Wm2u9koKvN/rOEXuek+HakNxguMgaSEX2AsnklgLIReVvoi0uDGan SzWGuC8906ZWs3zqMv1Mv5VjGzUlCiIr5DyUxyEPWoEV+1dFTBLEp3aFMrwBJ44X7m lTcbor+3EibvA== Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 20:26:51 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: David Matlack Cc: Baoquan He , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Dave Young , Alexander Graf Subject: Re: RFC: Enable Sashiko code reviews for kexec@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: kexec@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+kexec=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 09:29:55AM -0700, David Matlack wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 1:04 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > Hi Baoquan, > > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 01:52:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > > On 09/02/26 at 07:34am, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 01:27:34PM -0700, David Matlack wrote: > > > > > Hi kexec@ mailing list and maintainers, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to enable Sashiko code reviews for patches sent to the > > > > > kexec mailing list. I have found it useful for patches I have sent and > > > > > reviewed on the kvm and linux-pci mailing lists, which have Sashiko > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > > > I sent a pull request to Sashiko to add kexec here: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/474 > > > > > > > > diff --git a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > > > index e6e4fb57f..e9ad97708 100644 > > > > --- a/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > > > +++ b/sashiko.dev/email_policy.toml > > > > @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ reply_to_author = false > > > > cc_individuals = false > > > > cc = ["Chuck Lever ", "Jeff Layton ", "Anna Schumaker "] > > > > > > > > +[subsystems.kexec] > > > > +lists = ["kexec@lists.infradead.org"] > > > > +reply_to_author = true > > > > +send_positive_review = true > > > > > > > > Do we really want those? > > > > > > Some components don't want to CC list, then other people are welcome to > > > drop any comment during reviewing, while cc to maintainer and author > > > looks good to me. Just an input, no objection to any move. > > > > Sorry, I wasn't clear, I meant do we really want extra emails saying > > sashiko is happy? > > This is currently enabled on the PCI mailing list and I have found it > useful there. It makes it trivial to distinguish between "Sashiko > reviewed the patch and found no issues" and "Sashiko did not review > the patch" (could not apply it, backend bugs, whatever) without having > to go to the Sashiko web UI to confirm. I can stay entirely on the > mailing list. > > But I am ok with dropping it if you feel strongly. It is a small thing. Nah, no strong feelings. I can always /dev/null some emails on my side :) -- Sincerely yours, Mike.