All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Cole Munz <Munzzyy1@proton.me>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't error on dequeue of a completed request
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 23:30:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aptTU3JD0xPMPmfL@vbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0cdcd76b7a6a3c841b7957a2b761ae71ceb46fc.1788549031.git.Munzzyy1@proton.me>

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026, Cole Munz wrote:
> Dequeuing a request that has already been given back logs an error and
> returns -EINVAL:
> 
>   dwc3 23000000.usb: request 00000000ad92f1c4 was not queued to ep0out
> 
> f_fs hits this on every teardown. functionfs_unbind() dequeues ep0req
> unconditionally before freeing it, which
> commit ce405d561b02 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: Ensure ep0req is dequeued
> before free_request") made deliberate to close a use-after-free. By then
> the control transfer has long completed, so dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue()
> finds the request on none of cancelled_list, pending_list or
> started_list and falls through to the error path.
> 
> Nothing is actually wrong. The request is not queued, which is what the
> caller asked for, and both callers ignore the return value and free the
> request straight after. The only effect is an error line in every gadget
> teardown, which buries real USB errors.
> 
> dwc3 already tracks enough to tell the two cases apart.
> dwc3_gadget_ep_alloc_request() sets DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_UNKNOWN, both
> __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue() and __dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue() set
> DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_QUEUED, and dwc3_gadget_giveback() sets
> DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED. A request that reaches the end of dequeue
> with status COMPLETED was queued to this endpoint and has finished.
> Anything else was never queued here, or the driver lost track of it.
> Keep the error for those, and return success for a completed request.
> 
> A completed request still has to be dequeued on the endpoint it belongs
> to. req->dep is set once at allocation and never changes, and
> __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue() rejects the same mismatch with a WARN, so a
> wrong-endpoint dequeue stays on the error path here as well.
> 
> This is narrower than the cdnsp fix for the same caller,
> commit 34f08eb0ba6e ("usb: cdnsp: Fixes issue with dequeuing not queued
> requests"), which returns 0 whenever usb_request::status is not
> -EINPROGRESS. That also swallows a request that was never queued, since
> status is zero out of allocation. Going by dwc3's own request status
> keeps that case an error, which is what was asked for when a separate
> ep0 dequeue was proposed in 2022.
> 
> Fixes: 72246da40f37 ("usb: Introduce DesignWare USB3 DRD Driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20221117054917.30104-1-quic_ugoswami@quicinc.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!exBSfbxMvn0256JnM9YGZHRuDHPfgf1X4grkdaDDfYGqfbWTc9oBZslv4KvNpjA_wmWM9R9rXsh508WX1YaBoJs$ 
> Assisted-by: LLM sparse
> Signed-off-by: Cole Munz <Munzzyy1@proton.me>
> ---
> v3: cut the block comment down to one line.
> v2: add Fixes:, Cc: stable and Assisted-by tags.
> 
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index fa944856f956..9ff6a733d3c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -2181,9 +2181,12 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue(struct usb_ep *ep,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_err(dwc->dev, "request %p was not queued to %s\n",
> -		request, ep->name);
> -	ret = -EINVAL;
> +	/* Dequeuing a completed request is a no-op, not an error. */
> +	if (req->status != DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED || req->dep != dep) {
> +		dev_err(dwc->dev, "request %p was not queued to %s\n",
> +			request, ep->name);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>  
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

NAK.

This is not a fix. This changes the dequeue() behavior. You're breaking
the documented behavior of usb_ep_dequeue():

	If the request is still active on the endpoint, it is dequeued and
	eventually its completion routine is called (with status -ECONNRESET);
	else a negative error code is returned.  This routine is asynchronous,
	that is, it may return before the completion routine runs.

BR,
Thinh

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 16:13 [PATCH RESEND] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't error on dequeue of a completed request Cole Munz
2026-09-04 16:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-04 16:58   ` [PATCH v2] " Cole Munz
2026-09-04 17:07     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-09-04 20:00       ` [PATCH v3] " Cole Munz
2026-09-04 23:30         ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2026-09-05  0:02           ` Cole Munz
2026-09-05  1:22             ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-09-05  2:03               ` Cole Munz
2026-09-11 23:39                 ` Thinh Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aptTU3JD0xPMPmfL@vbox \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Munzzyy1@proton.me \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.