From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Lee Trager <ltrager@nvidia.com>, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Add asymmetric SMT packing override
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:27:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq2CqGXjH_lrZVnS@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtD6i7BMpfnj4pEPJMMOSXyMWL63YDX00d+jRTn0x+ot7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 06:03:53PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
...
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > index 33cd30996e47e..36c3b2e563441 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > @@ -6799,6 +6799,17 @@ Kernel parameters
> > > solution to mutex-based priority inversion.
> > > Format: <bool>
> > >
> > > + sched_smt_asym_packing= [KNL,SMP]
> > > + Override asymmetric packing at the SMT scheduling domain.
> > > + Format: { auto | on | off }
> > > + auto: Preserve the architecture default. This is the
> > > + default when the option is omitted.
>
> AFAICT "auto" equals nothing added in the command line so why is it needed ?
Right, auto is redundant. Omitting the parameter already preserves the topology
provided by the architecture or firmware.
>
> > > + on: Force asymmetric packing at the SMT scheduling domain.
> > > + Idle CPU selection prefers siblings with a higher
> > > + architecture-defined priority. Siblings with equal
> > > + priorities remain unordered.
> > > + off: Ignore SMT sibling priorities.
>
> Is this for debugging purposes?
Yes, that was the intent, but I don't have a concrete use case that justifies
exposing it.
>
> only the sched_smt_asym_packing=on is really useful to force
> asym_packing when firmware doesn't provide the info
Agreed. I'll simplify the interface to an explicit force option for systems
whose firmware can't describe the SMT preference.
Thanks,
-Andrea
>
> > > +
> >
> > Wasn't this option/parameter to come from arch specific file?
> >
> > Isn't it going to be confusing for archs which don't benefit from asym packing at SMT,
> > but now there is kernel parameter to say on.
> >
> > > sched_verbose [KNL,EARLY] Enables verbose scheduler debug messages.
> > >
> > > schedstats= [KNL,X86] Enable or disable scheduled statistics.
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > index 0248227d983a7..cdfcecf673fd7 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,46 @@ static int __init sched_debug_setup(char *str)
> > > }
> > > early_param("sched_verbose", sched_debug_setup);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > > +enum sched_smt_asym_packing_mode {
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static enum sched_smt_asym_packing_mode sched_smt_asym_packing __read_mostly =
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO;
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const sched_smt_asym_packing_modes[SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR] = {
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO] = "auto",
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON] = "on",
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF] = "off",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int __init sched_smt_asym_packing_parse(const char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + for (int mode = 0; mode < SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR; mode++) {
> > > + if (!strcmp(str, sched_smt_asym_packing_modes[mode]))
> > > + return mode;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __init setup_sched_smt_asym_packing(char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + int mode = sched_smt_asym_packing_parse(str);
> > > +
> > > + if (mode < 0)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + sched_smt_asym_packing = mode;
> > > + return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +__setup("sched_smt_asym_packing=", setup_sched_smt_asym_packing);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > static inline bool sched_debug(void)
> > > {
> > > return sched_debug_verbose;
> > > @@ -1950,6 +1990,15 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
> > > if (WARN_ONCE(sd_flags & ~TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS,
> > > "wrong sd_flags in topology description\n"))
> > > sd_flags &= TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > > + if (sd_flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) {
> > > + if (sched_smt_asym_packing == SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON)
> > > + sd_flags |= SD_ASYM_PACKING;
> > > + else if (sched_smt_asym_packing ==
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF)
> > > + sd_flags &= ~SD_ASYM_PACKING;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> > > sd_flags |= asym_cpu_capacity_classify(sd_span, cpu_map);
> > >
> > > *sd = (struct sched_domain){
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 14:05 [PATCH v6 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 16:55 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-18 6:28 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-18 15:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-21 14:40 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Add asymmetric SMT packing override Andrea Righi
2026-09-18 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-18 16:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-18 18:27 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-09-18 18:24 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-21 9:04 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-29 12:31 ` Andrea Righi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-29 16:54 [PATCH v7 " Andrea Righi
2026-09-29 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Add asymmetric SMT packing override Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aq2CqGXjH_lrZVnS@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltrager@nvidia.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.