All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, phil@nwl.cc,
	shuah@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:24:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq4qtFAKULch5dTl@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918183109.3918131-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> The bridge test flakes on debug kernels:
> 
>   FAIL: Expected 10 packets total, but got 24 packets total
>   hook 3 packets 00000008
>   hook 4 packets 00000010
> 
> The surplus are icmp fragment reassembly timeouts.  The udp flood in the
> stress test leaves incomplete datagrams behind in ns2 and ns3, 30 seconds
> later their reassembly queues expire and both namespaces send icmp time
> exceeded to ns1's pre-bridge address.  ns3 is not reconfigured when the
> router is turned into a bridge, so its messages arrive via veth2 and are
> then forwarded out of br0. Such packets are locally originated from the
> bridge point of view and are queued from the bridge output and
> postrouting hooks, which is why only those two counters are off.
> 
> Restrict the ipv4 rule to echo request/reply, the icmpv6 rule already
> does this.
> 
> We used to see 1 flake a day in NIPA before locally queuing this change,
> zero flakes since (over 9 days)

Thanks for debugging and fixing this!

Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

> The difference between v4 and v6 has been there from day one,
> which makes it seem intentional, but I don't understand nft
> well enough to come up with any theories why..

Without the restriction this would also queue IPv6 neighbour
discovery messages.

ARP is not seen by NFPROTO_IPV4 hooks, so the restriction
was not needed. I simply did not think of icmp reassembly
timeout errors getting sent after some time when I wrote
this.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18 18:31 [PATCH nf-next] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-19  6:24 ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aq4qtFAKULch5dTl@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.