From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Upadhyay, Tejas" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: "sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev"
<sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [V3] drm/xe: Skip clearing purged page-table BOs
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:09:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqBdYNhD2b+EKCUy@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR11MB8718070BCCDE4CF62B8F94F581B12@DS0PR11MB8718.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 01:26:04PM +0000, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 08 September 2026 17:35
> > To: Upadhyay, Tejas <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [V3] drm/xe: Skip clearing purged page-table BOs
> >
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s)
> > to consider:
> >
> > New issues:
> > - [Critical] Early release of xe_svm_notifier_lock in xe_vm_close allows MMU
> > notifiers to unmap memory while GPU page tables are still valid, leading to a
> > physical memory use-after-free.
> >
> > Pre-existing issues:
> > - [High] Missing NULL check for pagetable BO `vmap` in
> > `xe_pt_zap_ptes_entry` leads to a crash if the BO is purged.
> > --
> >
> > commit 70efaa606c2633943ad2267dfc95c288525971af
> > Author: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
> >
> > drm/xe: Skip clearing purged page-table BOs
> >
> > VRAM page offlining can clear a page-table BO's vmap before VM teardown
> > calls xe_pt_clear(). Check for a purged BO under its dma-resv lock before
> > writing to the mapping.
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > index 5d990c1c3740a..426e8a29c755a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > @@ -236,9 +236,11 @@ void xe_pt_destroy(struct xe_pt *pt, u32 flags,
> > struct llist_head *deferred)
> > > */
> > > void xe_pt_clear(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_pt *pt) {
> > > - struct iosys_map *map = &pt->bo->vmap;
> > > + struct xe_bo *bo = pt->bo;
> > >
> > > - xe_map_memset(xe, map, 0, 0, SZ_4K);
> > > + xe_bo_assert_held(bo);
> > > + if (!iosys_map_is_null(&bo->vmap))
> > > + xe_map_memset(xe, &bo->vmap, 0, 0, SZ_4K);
> > > }
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does xe_pt_zap_ptes_entry() in
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c have a similar regression with missing NULL
> > checks for the pagetable BO vmap?
> >
> > Looking at xe_pt_zap_ptes_entry(), it accesses &xe_child->bo->vmap without
> > validating it:
>
> Found couple of more places like, add_compact_pt_prl() and xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu(). Will hand there as well.
>
See my comment here [1]. Properly handling offline PT BOs and making
this safe with respect to zaps, asynchronous VM binds, and asynchronous
TLB invalidations will likely require a larger follow-up change. Let's
focus on getting this fix merged first before expanding the scope, as
this change is both necessary and correct on its own.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/750921/?series=173375&rev=1#comment_1384263
> >
> > xe_map_memset(tile_to_xe(xe_walk->tile), &xe_child->bo->vmap,
> > offset * sizeof(u64), 0,
> > (end_offset - offset) * sizeof(u64));
> >
> > This is reachable via xe_vm_invalidate_vma(), which only holds the user BO's
> > dma_resv lock or the SVM notifier_lock as seen in xe_pt_zap_ptes():
> >
> > else if (xe_vma_is_userptr(vma))
> > lockdep_assert_held(&xe_vma_vm(vma)-
> > >svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
> >
> > Since the page-table BO's dma_resv lock (the VM dma_resv lock) is not held,
> > could a concurrent VRAM page offlining event purge the page-table BO and
> > clear its vmap, leading to a NULL pointer dereference when
> > xe_map_memset() executes?
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 9e71567b27cc7..e77ff3cf3ca38 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -1876,10 +1876,13 @@ static void xe_vm_close(struct xe_vm *vm)
> > > bound = drm_dev_enter(&xe->drm, &idx);
> > >
> > > down_write(&vm->lock);
> > > + xe_vm_lock(vm, false);
> > > +
> > > if (xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm))
> > > xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm);
> > > -
> > > vm->size = 0;
> > > + if (xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm))
> > > + xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
> >
> > [Severity: Critical]
> > Does moving xe_svm_notifier_unlock() here create a race condition with
> > MMU notifiers?
>
> Will fix this.
>
Yea, don't move how long this lock is held in this patch.
Matt
> Tejas
> >
> > If xe_svm_notifier_unlock() is called here before the GPU page tables are
> > cleared and the TLB is invalidated, a concurrent MMU notifier like
> > xe_svm_invalidate() could execute.
> >
> > Since vm->size is 0, xe_svm_invalidate() in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c will
> > check:
> >
> > if (xe_vm_is_closed(vm))
> > goto range_notifier_event_end;
> >
> > This check evaluates to true, skipping the zapping of GPU page tables and
> > allowing the physical memory to be freed prematurely. Could the GPU then
> > still read and write to these freed physical pages (which might be reallocated
> > to other processes) until xe_vm_close() finally clears the page tables?
> >
> > --
> > Sashiko AI review ·
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908114545.915049-2-
> > tejas.upadhyay@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 11:45 [V3] drm/xe: Skip clearing purged page-table BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-08 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 13:26 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-08 19:09 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-09-08 13:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Skip clearing purged page-table BOs (rev3) Patchwork
2026-09-08 14:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-08 19:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqBdYNhD2b+EKCUy@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.