From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70102C79F8C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 07:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1412620.1643016 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4Cdm-0004Fg-LC; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:42 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1412620.1643016; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4Cdm-0004FZ-Gn; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:42 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1412620; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:41 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4Cdl-0004FT-Jq for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:41 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x4Cdh-006KpL-3A; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:38 +0000 Received: from 224.pool85-54-217.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.217.224] helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x4Cdi-007L4p-1V; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:22:38 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=FE1URNGmNGeJXKw7trSii6LEWHPhb09jYiVQReAtcio=; b=iVg88/ll3nU9wxuqSZfGDc239L SGAsw4S+QLVZmetr1TUjCy8hutM5OYKXo91zdSTvNJCMlYgwRGMp7Q7YNN/85piyAxHiQa8o+AyIQ k1g+OcFXYVX7q1Ogm0EuSe1GZtE8ES5vLYlKn0s3run7jTn/7YUVAHA4FFNOdjAVD0FI=; Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:22:28 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , Teddy Astie , Xen-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] x86/PCI: use pci_sbdf_t also for pci_dev_base() Message-ID: References: <20260908215721.3346842-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 09:16:46AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > No need to pass three arguments when both callers already hold SBDF in > their hands. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger.