Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: greybus: light: add comments to mutex definitions

[Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 05:56:25AM +0000, contectforbusiness@proton.me wrote:
> checkpatch complains about:
> 
>   CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment
> 
> Add short comments describing what each mutex protects.

Is this an AI patch?  Why write a short description?  That's the
opposite of what I want.  I want a complete analysis.

> The
> channel lock protects the channel state and lights_lock protects
> the lights array.
> 
> No functional change, just quiets checkpatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav <contectforbusiness@proton.me>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/light.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> index cab02b5da..a036fa2a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct gb_channel {
>  	bool				releasing;
>  	bool				strobe_state;
>  	bool				active;
> -	struct mutex			lock;
> +	struct mutex			lock; /* protects channel */

This comment is useless and wrong.

I hate this checkpatch warning...

regards,
dan carpenter