From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Account cgroup CPU time to the execution context
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 07:48:05 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqGb1ar23XBzdaKn@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANDhNCq5iPq87=iKSJv-XzYzTYJ8Hp+bPJ6SoVfWB3pRa=HypQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 10:17:45PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
...
> But if it is causing trouble for the accounting, and you think it
> makes more sense the other way, I'll trust your judgement.
> Tentatively:
> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
>
> Eventually I think we'll want to track per-task "donated" and "gifted"
> time so folks can more finely distinguish the accounting.
Yeah, I want the cgroup base stats to agree with what's reported for
threads. This makes it disagree with bw enforcement but I think it makes
more sense to bridge that gap with explicit stats for proxy execution like
you're suggesting.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 3:47 [PATCH v2] sched: Account cgroup CPU time to the execution context Hui Su
2026-09-04 6:37 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-09 5:17 ` John Stultz
2026-09-09 6:08 ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 17:48 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqGb1ar23XBzdaKn@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.