From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17A5319851 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 01:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789002193; cv=none; b=pPIQqcPqtsx8L4QqjzwRAGfe8gQ3tWZ8/Ghlh5sL14BBZRT5/ps4XTeSFAS7QjvrdMXen5vPDmUcBiJVirLdHQGO4RebfzgCHmFAVfHWVoxwsBrYSaU+wRqeBdNRlwZPA4leItxtNJWjvwNOLr1JAok/6/liY2HtK4obSgHGY9A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789002193; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BTKpJLHGXNkyYUhWATg0COH3LNHy+qT5hNJWJohx2to=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HyzgCegx1Y+BcXFgA3HnFxIzWL9btYHcvCofK6uwGEXRCDA1bc0LXiSGIwwoM6vaAKGU7k4FgOrLophwqq3i+TkNH/zLbw+N4oSwSYxgEjU2yUEpscbB3+k67Dj3wi58Sr5sbNrBp0Mx/qQffqmzls2V+dz85f4nnfj2HDQTZl4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QYCdNDJS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QYCdNDJS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9349C1F000FF; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 01:03:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789002192; bh=Yp+3gU1LAc/wyHzHhn3IgT2GDscH8d/CdOmIcLaKvSI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=QYCdNDJSFGce8zSa7x1n8JPeNJfArRWUqn3FwdaQX+bdSTq0a1jqc7k1w+w2j2bfD FWzmendr/+r4A2ai6hnY0SNTXyH/CKPnGwGh/jAh9JzYGYHKqFi5Be73XN0plqlojt ER+damfxPUDh89aJ/yZ94FNBlBvaY2BRJjjKRBYKX24vfLYKjZZip33oyPlyGXdxCD 94y3aMhw8jNh/1OvgDWnlgOcsWY3aybVQhUtAHdz7Jm4kbfSOTi5Jnica4FBvKpfpU YLekiJ2wGzm3G6/MK44tMjepHals3cpRPSjn/h5gNPfD6WNbDaKEqvezEayGJ1Sd89 RKV93HCfbKCLQ== Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 03:03:09 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Pei Xiao Cc: kernel test robot , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Damien Le Moal Subject: Re: [libata:for-next 7/7] drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c:707:13: warning: conflicting types for 'pi_remove_one'; have 'void(struct device *)' Message-ID: References: <202609100732.jcpwPdM6-lkp@intel.com> <1f3cbeb0-29ca-405e-8604-4a4fcb55e0a1@kylinos.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1f3cbeb0-29ca-405e-8604-4a4fcb55e0a1@kylinos.cn> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 08:53:40AM +0800, Pei Xiao wrote: > 在 2026/9/10 07:15, kernel test robot 写道: > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/libata/linux.git for-next > > head: d82c5cf658c306979c786a6702487cf9fbc2b5de > > commit: d82c5cf658c306979c786a6702487cf9fbc2b5de [7/7] ata: pata_parport: unregister devices on protocol unregister > > config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260910/202609100732.jcpwPdM6-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260910/202609100732.jcpwPdM6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609100732.jcpwPdM6-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c: In function 'pi_remove_by_proto': > > drivers/ata/pata_parport/pata_parport.c:621:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pi_remove_one' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > hi Maintainer, > I'm very sorry about this. I haven't had my physical machine with me > recently, so this patch hasn't been tested. What should I do now? Do I > need to revert this patch, or should I just fix this compilation error? I dropped this series from for-7.4. Please send a new version that you have actually tested. Kind regards, Niklas