From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB72DC79F9F for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1414077.1643916 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4ZXl-00022Z-0V; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:50:01 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1414077.1643916; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:50:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4ZXk-00022S-UA; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:50:00 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1414077; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:49:59 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1x4ZXj-00022M-DV for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:49:59 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x4ZXh-00801K-2v; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:49:58 +0000 Received: from 224.pool85-54-217.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.217.224] helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1x4ZXi-006Sm2-1H; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:49:58 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=/nkYktJ/Gms1fzlmyRlujUNA/qmGw3jyNW7tB6Jbk0A=; b=wbZO2Y+O3TZfMPE9irRLKAt8e/ 9cRow/HOqoZ5rwXZ7x66/YpwQPjJ7806mfo7QFkijSBi/gayppt8VP0bq1KnRcayRkoepHq5YiQ0Q jsGwl/w+Dsr9k0vRJAjYZ3uHbszvcKHMxFvR4W26VtelmwNSN8mMjIWhZBaoarrjZvyA=; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:49:56 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Nicola Vetrini , Andrew Cooper , Teddy Astie Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] x86/crash: address Misra 2.1 rule violation Message-ID: References: <90d0e3d6-2e12-43f1-815d-7936ca4c5fc6@suse.com> <96de425a-29f7-4759-8466-b72bbe40b90b@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96de425a-29f7-4759-8466-b72bbe40b90b@suse.com> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 09:02:18AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > The use of unreachable(), when unreachability is visible to Eclair (and > compilers), is deemed a violation. Drop the redundant statement. Urg, isn't that something that should be fixed in Eclair then? Otherwise all the unreachable() calls in our codebase are likely to be found by Eclair sooner or later, and will need to be removed. Thanks, Roger.