From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7CC49E5D5 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.136 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789141973; cv=fail; b=M7Y8iwt0miRcaq9KknwkdVh4+48jkRE+3Y3xZQ8S79yM/xbBHuOTtsOOCeiiWBEsZz3SLzpwPvZYDoiKOYqS1R6Z2hxXdt9vlWhQNWy6r0j7UOnmNW2ciiDWd4gPIFQ7RUdVLjCsY1cczn04UHE1hTIB5homtddeW/UUdt+kotM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789141973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZC81Tmzq/xW73fOJCMx+kv0K1vuGfGLjhV+nKKmd0rU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UpP4UlW6jKbrCteSFmnlDyydX/amoGeM5EHwLoqJuYQLJlsb/QsI7p7WKrWgwF1eLHjVvLvmD8hLzLVyxE+omyXA036wk5Pog6YRamVrEL5jcUt0J5ZOwZMi03WX+022KU9r3U6bNzxaJ609ymql7UwhTrKUpTgzR8cKdjkr2oI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b=MMFLdt5D; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.136 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.b="MMFLdt5D" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147C46062B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:52:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.351 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9yPUHWWxRaMD for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:52:51 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.3.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 9AC3C605FD Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=18.9.28.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=osuosl.org; s=arc; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1789141971; b=n8HXWY+jFoWWF7hlcWv0Is7ah0h6fhZ4eVDLqg4H6oxiFOszFm5zhK+/le4WhTtGllVw Nc1qtyimzwGVb1NvrW3RxQqQ6teosOejH4taHnNgkn4PLFCpz5QrnYIkQGuNexa+NGVM+ o4I+pf+UGWJUgXwmLllLU4yvihLgWyJMGp0lawOGuOp4ew2LT+MlPMDgtvB17vPrPP7YG xskSlPiGAYOznmdZSpvInicI/QvyFsdrxr7rpv3LQnb+dpND+nQ/LaM4UgHs2jZKQ+oMy OwRhm+UBnORfiSpFkYnJ5fEvb7Qhub7/vVxgb+/ZIdt033e1ylbFk/+jgd95h5k+oLw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=osuosl.org; s=arc; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1789141971; h=X-Greylist:Received-SPF:Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From: To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=YwUDeiXHpmFyCzJXnxfvkql3DtfhhEb2+PNUcc3jbgY=; b=HsW70HaAGb6ptYuberFrufzD6jq+tvsMmBHDXij87v77rF33qcNGs+91U6pCcD+G2bI1 xwQUdYVGotoyOw7NQVxZRxZaavYDZq6R9M5gfxZM7IKzPL2kYAaG7n0jurgrFhZcSOWwU GA/F8u8jcqVP9+Dx0S9rxXNNCgH7tw/Qby4CQzV5VctoBSM8apSuB+cFmOyC7/astOMSc H4/3hq069bz8lfm+6Izv36GbGMbDkNZYy3JPNBc77SmtcyCiydxgNpSbkTKXJYlOYhFvz gbjslR2idF3+7EN9cUXsnlanz75c0WWgYGcF78ql3vqIe9tGWZFLgvjwpUzV9fMWQ8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp3.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass header.from=mit.edu; dkim=pass header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=outgoing header.b=MMFLdt5D; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=18.9.28.11 X-Greylist: delayed 169 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:52:50 UTC Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=mit.edu header.i=@mit.edu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=outgoing header.b=MMFLdt5D Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=18.9.28.11; helo=outgoing.mit.edu; envelope-from=tytso@mit.edu; receiver= Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AC3C605FD for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from macsyma.thunk.org (pool-108-26-156-127.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.156.127]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 68BFnmtv019621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:49:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1789141791; bh=YwUDeiXHpmFyCzJXnxfvkql3DtfhhEb2+PNUcc3jbgY=; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MMFLdt5DpIg0nFphptTs3xb3ssF9QLbN2aupWet0Dn8TdNn+FOtZ+YHkIGFTI7L+J wR5VVZ13OPtYm0KPoc/5sJC1qUIR7gKd+/E1LxEUYjhTubHYuO24AOj64VQEdrJvna YRTEMiITK1HwNtKvqv3rpO4F3nCuYpTpWHN0osyy9UEtZkWE022k40ZSTNMiS9XzmB LogQNvlQ/qIXoDpIZbVjkL3gLuorL56hKiG01R+9JbF+cydCNCfaxGxxMiOf85eO0h czGOOCuqc9UaX+EdF5bAmvLYQMPAmacuciCLDGqImqBFQDZao7hTURZAbkMMrNIns+ Ycw7xTRie+V2g== Received: by macsyma.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 171C21484413; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:48:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:48:48 -0400 From: "Theodore Tso" To: Dave Hansen Cc: James Bottomley , Steven Rostedt , Monika Masciangelo , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "contact@linuxplumbersconf.org" Subject: Re: [lpc-contact] Memorial for Dan Williams Message-ID: References: <20260910144152.38a97e53@gandalf.local.home> <20260911084435.3b05ccd3@gandalf.local.home> <77a723fd27e3a3cbba461217ad233bca0ef39716.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tech-board-discuss@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 07:23:29AM -0500, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/11/26 05:53, James Bottomley wrote: > > Actually that's just a technical detail about the way remote A/V works, > > so every remote A/V tool technically records. However, we could spin > > up an ephemeral BBB instance and shred it after the event to ensure > > there are no traces left if that would make people happier? > > I'm not super worried about it either way. Basically as long as a > recording doesn't end up on YouTube, I'm OK with it. This should be Dave's call, but my personal feeling is that if there are some critically important people who can only attend remotely (including possibly some of Dan's family if some or all of them can't travel) we should definitely do BBB. If not, there will always be some people who might be uncomfortable if there is active A/V; even if we don't record it, someone on the remote end could. That seems relatively unlikely to me, but it's more about what other people might feel/perceive/fear. Could it still be worthwhile? One compromise might be that we don't broadcast the BBB link, but we only make it available to people who explicitly ask ahead of time. Dave, what do you think? - ted