From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E2DC88E4D for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x53aE-00009N-Eq; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:54:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x53a9-00009B-KN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:54:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x53a7-000429-8g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:54:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1789142059; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PqFdjDZDSL4KFrLZvXicREIlIhrSfJCxxjgHKaNpYvg=; b=Sv9XnEhAGbPpCAHrFS+IFc3SdPYUfiDqBEzhHvvyImkcFkZOK1GRfJqgVScGdXRNH7TSGY WVB1KuUAc1/dZidWLAeGq1F2R2WaMe1TDl2G15ZY6qcw3rq9TFgRBJO0IFEnu3uhMIjY6+ /JYOYgRJ5hSB4ZbgyHVOK7JgSy7cNyI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-173-dk6J6WxINLu-Ma5BynTPmg-1; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:54:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dk6J6WxINLu-Ma5BynTPmg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: dk6J6WxINLu-Ma5BynTPmg_1789142056 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F05818009E2; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (headnet05.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.117]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44965195608F; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:54:09 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Peter Maydell Cc: David Woodhouse , mark.syms@citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, sstabellini@kernel.org, anthony@xenproject.org, paul@xen.org, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com Subject: Re: [BUG] hw/xen: features published after InitWait since 240cc11369fc Message-ID: References: <30ec634b6072ac23c38a6a05bf3f90de4b383632.camel@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.0 (2026-06-19) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 03:56:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sept 2026 at 15:39, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I wasn't *actually* setting out to comment on the AI policy today — in > > fact I didn't really have a strong opinion on it. I spend enough of my > > life tilting at windmills *intentionally*; this wasn't meant to be one > > of them. snip > Yes. I view that email as pretty strong data for 'even a policy > shift which says "we're OK with accepting some kinds of AI > generated code" should still be pretty strong on "text intended > for humans to read (docs, commit messages, mailing list posts, etc) > should be written by humans"'. I think that review commentary on > Paolo's RFC about a less strict policy tended to be in that direction, > so I don't think I'm completely out on a limb here. The latest proposed policy explicitly forbids sending AI text to people: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-09/msg00260.html [quote] ### No AI-written text must reach maintainers These rules apply when publishing AI-assisted work to GitLab or the mailing list: - **AI-written cover letters and commit messages are banned**. These are easy to recognize and waste reviewers' time. - **AI-generated responses to reviewer comments are banned**. This undermines the human-to-human interaction fundamental to code review. - **AI-written issue ("work item") descriptions or comments are banned**. These are verbose and waste triagers' time. [/quote] With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|