From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Noah Feldt <noah@feldt.systems>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
N.Feldt@mittwald.de, carnil@debian.org, dschatzberg@meta.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, peterz@infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:57:25 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqQy9UMKmXnKd934@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqQlowpkYrTaVmid@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 06:11:42PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 05:55:45PM +0200, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
> > Though, the fix loses a bit of elegance. Hm, thinking...
>
> So, it occurs to me that the ->live based predicate from v2 might break
> CSS_TASK_ITER_WITH_DEAD callers (zombies they asked for would be
> skipped).
> We need to distinguish between (both on dying_tasks list):
> - regular zombies waiting to be reaped and
> - RCU remnant tasks that are going to be free'd.
> IIUC these two are split on the ->usage count. (Correct me if I'm
> wrong.)
>
> I'm starting to like the tryget_task_struct() approach from v1 again.
Yeah, let's go back to v1. Sorry about the noise.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 19:27 [PATCH v2] cgroup: Avoid iteration of dying tasks with zero refcount Noah Feldt
2026-09-08 15:55 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-11 16:11 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-11 16:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-07 17:03 Michal Koutný
2026-09-07 17:07 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqQy9UMKmXnKd934@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=N.Feldt@mittwald.de \
--cc=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dschatzberg@meta.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=noah@feldt.systems \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.