From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC833C88E40 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:22:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=i+y6EyvhJZ+5UXCtxTi8eBCjk+E6G1UZMcXcjm2mOmk=; b=MocyCFGEdtYeSv usMGeb4EEJRMXivkhyoWwCLq2cfLqKc+u4+rnTepnWORLNk9upuZv72H6GSIwY05YBD7iDZAGanSH KQQ6yHIoWm6I5s2orBYBE7IXHFEWen93ZGTXxr3gk1t7OWv4EH/uw41hBjIqAuTTEB0QTA5OtJOzm Rrcym5V/9Faxf+V+wDEz5UpQj7WByLPHPrPZHQUSfp43s7y+SUqzJ/49sbQuT47spzB/b4JDZqPnb Pxl2/T5rSaErrcPduvznLTenrBiZbf+yO1Rb2gPOZYdUehKQEBS3VCvrjRkKMM5a4DeHbCAgN+Ywk fMHJcawJY1KRXuE9tk0w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x5dba-00000001SNh-1tDo; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:22:22 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x5dbZ-00000001SNY-0xYk for linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:22:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C769E60AAF; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 966501F000FF; Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:22:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789280539; bh=7O0ijmU/63M3r27RIHOfPvuoO9Nzvs8zYyUzoD6v4J8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Sy+aDC9JoaxxV0w0LSHTaYGkr5Sp7dyL5FC3zlcdJX62ZYbUjU3JLD31BP6TkO/f4 fUkrlG8gPnHUKLzKyug7JboVFMkUlJTY+xCfnlvu/DPp0Z/gCCeZO5kQg35wU/Czbf sPwuQQ6Xf/VG67+lrmJPbqmvxAcD6VgBGoWvtPdOUZlorJQo3ZSEKlPqTCZGY1wz8N FXpkLJhzlGSu1zoHCXd+zfhcF3UmupNg5QbhVRIppoMwuzu84+jrIiwN2rx8nKYyha oKbIYdx9M6OzwbJkJrZPT9tebELeaKhcW5eDIVNdfLoN+JlT5SVm2E4IrIN8IU/ACz FqcYQfHX6SRMg== Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 11:52:14 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Neil Armstrong , Kathiravan T , Baruch Siach , Dmitry Baryshkov , Krishna Kurapati , Manu Gautam , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] phy: qcom-qusb2: sort out register layouts Message-ID: References: <20260706-fix-qusb2-v2-0-8d9cd73b1db7@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260706-fix-qusb2-v2-0-8d9cd73b1db7@oss.qualcomm.com> X-BeenThere: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Phy Mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-phy" Errors-To: linux-phy-bounces+linux-phy=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 06-07-26, 16:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > IPQ6018 and MSM8996 use the same register layout, however for historical > reasons ipq6018_regs_layout ended up correctly definig TEST1 register at > 0x98 (because platforms using that layout didn't use autoresume), while > msm8996_regs_layout used TEST_CTRL offset (0xb8) for the TEST1 layout > entry. Fix handling of the autoresume register and definitions of those > regs layouts. This fails to apply on the current code, can you please rebase -- ~Vinod -- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy