From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E4D4457D2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789385683; cv=none; b=PsaJtxKRUGOb9CbkuE+fQY318WcVkumGDxrC9XylkgO1s0tkv3N/COIXnj2c2d92SX6kbJi1eBs1O/F6zoUXSy+GkXkrKG7xji73if1M2TdQzrPDdlINx4V8G8TTKwEZ64/sEeEhVN0YJxFQJMghQIZl2L9WxQnKHqGWIRz0ik0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789385683; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OZLmEOrCfT+ySXmxd7Yn1HWMMhubrpmEzn6xfYZQFtU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LB9cfhlRPXaKcvslnMOOm9UFPPiVBni9meI7cCXVUtNZJgUtI4WoqZkFERiid6cVP2WltniyRmRtKWP/UY3/7j6tAPGrcSTSGVKbbIV+EgVpjY3fF+jlkB4XnSiWNDHtP4S4XFn/VCWxmEPklzSBwH0wJLzlV8FGy5bDgKhiBHk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b=OSZAyltf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b="OSZAyltf" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D65E205ED; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:34:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bh-8DKk_E5If; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCH-01.secunet.de (rl1.secunet.de [10.32.0.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1118201AA; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:34:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com A1118201AA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1789385678; bh=PXaSGHXRXXcpfxny2MjpzzTWMoLEkgVDIJkjM72Ufzw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OSZAyltfx5RY4c3wr7V7GqmLvEiqLgcNhuW3t7wiKS+eQVB7sivE9naqdIytU7CrG iUUYIft05ZsfAIPOTN9LVaBgSJpF+hbWU3OW8vvMZeDYq4Z8D1FIXPe14g97msNxsb 33n4wFT9eBDBIc688ito8huJAX0kCKCHrBJoif/l6eu0nvY0DHUCv1koG7Y5qzxQbn uPujKTX3oFJ0AZAXfd12WBphfNyzXuscMIqXJ9gKCEJka39VHHP/Mu91Q7yYoZOJFr P8oEPfPYmLs6pNNdg8wzDmMtzwlRn6DE2gpwe+qJ/H5h2xdr9moyPMCXmEfClO+dsj aXimVmCOjVhXA== Received: from secunet.com (10.182.7.193) by EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.37; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:34:37 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 1967778 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:34:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:34:37 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Jakub Kicinski CC: Paolo Abeni , David Miller , Herbert Xu , Subject: Re: Some clarifications on the upstreaming process Message-ID: References: <20260907093020.2228346-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> <70d0048d-694b-4348-a6a5-de87a767b8fd@redhat.com> <83dd4915-e7a3-4c7e-91dd-adbea16450b3@redhat.com> <20260909115753.75723ca1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260909115753.75723ca1@kernel.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCH-04.secunet.de (10.32.0.184) To EXCH-01.secunet.de (10.32.0.171) On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 12:44:08 +0200 Steffen Klassert wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 12:34:42PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > On 9/9/26 12:23 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > > Are you willing to pull this as is, or should I resend the pull > > > > request with the incremental fix? The latter leads to problem > > > > 4.1 (patch does not apply to net). > > > Due to time schedule I can't look into the series detail before tomorrow > > > my time. Since Jakub forwarded the AI report and left the series in PW I > > > assume he is looking for your replies to the AI comments - which is > > > pretty much would I'll do. > > > > It was a general question, not directly related to this pull request. > > > > There were several issues reported, it will take a bit of time > > to review the AI comments. > > Thanks, I'll toss this version form PW, please let us know if it's good > (enough) and we should pull as is after all. Most of the patches are OK, but I'll give the patch authors some time to comment and resend the pull request then. I send just the pull request without resending the patches to the list if that's OK. I don't want to have yet another AI review round...