From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: st_fdma: fix potential use-after-free in vchan tasklets
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:40:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqgVgZhsP6OQ0QvT@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912154629.1021632-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 11:46:29PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> st_fdma_probe() allocates the channel array with devm_kcalloc() and
> initializes an embedded virt-dma tasklet for each st_fdma_chan through
> vchan_init().
>
> The interrupt handler calls vchan_cookie_complete() or
> vchan_cyclic_callback(), which may schedule the tasklet. However,
> st_fdma_remove() only frees the IRQ and does not kill already scheduled
> tasklets.
>
> devm_free_irq() prevents new interrupt handlers from running and waits
> for an in-flight handler to finish, but it does not flush a tasklet
> that was scheduled by a previous interrupt. Since fdev->chans is
> devm-managed, the channel array is released after the remove callback
> returns.
>
> This leaves the following possible race:
>
> CPU0 (driver removal) CPU1 (IRQ / softirq)
> --------------------- --------------------
> st_fdma_irq_handler()
> vchan_cookie_complete()
> tasklet_schedule()
> return
> <tasklet pending>
>
> st_fdma_remove()
> devm_free_irq()
> ...
> return
>
> devres cleanup
> ...
> kfree(fdev->chans) // FREE
> vchan_complete()
> vc = from_tasklet(...)
> spin_lock_irq(&vc->lock)
> // USE -> UAF
>
> The pending tasklet is embedded in the devm-allocated st_fdma_chan.
> Once fdev->chans is released, the tasklet and the virt_dma_chan
> containing it point into freed memory. A later vchan_complete() can
> therefore dereference the freed channel and cause a potential
> use-after-free.
>
> Kill all vchan tasklets after freeing the IRQ. This prevents new
> interrupt handlers from scheduling them and waits for any tasklet that
> is already pending or running before the channel storage can be
> released.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 6b4cd727eaf15 ("dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
I prefer defer all tasklet tear down fix patches after
https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/5ae73ce5-1216-4012-abe0-aba9469ef089@deltatee.com/
Frank
> drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> index d9547017f3bd..23071cbf1866 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> @@ -846,8 +846,13 @@ static int st_fdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static void st_fdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int i;
>
> devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fdev->irq, fdev);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < fdev->nr_channels; i++)
> + tasklet_kill(&fdev->chans[i].vchan.task);
> +
> st_slim_rproc_put(fdev->slim_rproc);
> of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 15:46 [PATCH] dmaengine: st_fdma: fix potential use-after-free in vchan tasklets Guangshuo Li
2026-09-12 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 15:40 ` Frank Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqgVgZhsP6OQ0QvT@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.