From: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
To: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:58:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqoh27cSs5gMHeAL@sm-arm-grace07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915154305.3852871-1-weilin.chang@arm.com>
Hi Wei-Lin,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is v6 of optimizing the shadow s2 mmu unmapping during MMU
> notifiers.
>
> This version fixes a few issues, and adds Marc's space optimization
> for kvm_guest_s2_mapping [1]. Please see the changelog for the details.
>
> Tested by booting L3, and running in-kernel targetted tests described
> in [2]. v5 got some tested-by's from Itaru and Wang (thanks), I didn't
> carry them over since some bugs fixed in v6 are non-obvious. Some
> retest would be much appreciated!
>
> Series based on v7.3-rc3 + Marc's nested mmu lifecycle fixes [3].
Observed on QEMU (accel tcg) only, but I saw:
[ 1812.052752] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1630
[ 1812.052896] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 596, name: shadow_stage2
The kernel is built on top of Marc's fix and your version six series, but
the fix for debugfs will be posted later?
Your hello_nested and shadow_stage2 ran without an issue.
Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
Itaru.
>
> * Changes from v5 [4]:
>
> - Align the addresses down to the mapping size when recording the
> guest s2 mappings. s2fd->fault_ipa isn't necessarily PAGE_SIZE aligned.
>
> - Record guest s2 mappings even when page table maps return -EAGAIN.
> kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() can create mappings while returning -EAGAIN.
> For example, a 2M block map (A) could race with a 4K page map (B):
> 1. (A) maps the 2M block in kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb()
> 2. (B) breaks that block into a table and maps 4K
> 3. (A) reloads and finds the table after kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb(),
> then descends into it.
> 4. (A) maps some 4K, but before it finishes reads entry mapped by (B).
> 5. (A) returns -EAGAIN although it had mapped a few pages.
> In this case, we don't know what subrange is mapped, just track the whole
> requested mapping range.
>
> - Don't remove tracked mappings from the interval trees if they only
> partially overlap the removal range. Because of the previous bullet point
> we can have a 4K shadow mapping tracked as a 2M range in the interval
> trees. It would be wrong to remove the 2M range when a guest TLBI doesn't
> touch the 4K mapped.
>
> - Check mmu->pgt during mmu unmap notifier, as it could race against
> MMU teardown.
>
> - Make guest_s2_tracking_destroy() canonical mmu only. We simply don't
> need to detach the nodes from the nested mmus' trees. Freeing them
> during canonical mmu's teardown is enough.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/86h5jv7qrd.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/gerjpm62a2gszzggc6vuai22bf3prfquvfsp7ueumps7vz2ev3@odlmovaklg2b/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20260911162203.1919330-1-maz@kernel.org/
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20260810205038.118843-1-weilin.chang@arm.com/
>
> Marc Zyngier (1):
> KVM: arm64: nv: Drop kvm_s2_mmu pointer from kvm_guest_s2_mapping
>
> Wei-Lin Chang (6):
> KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map()
> KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures
> KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation
> KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal
> KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap
> KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 31 +++++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 7 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 15:42 [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Drop kvm_s2_mmu pointer from kvm_guest_s2_mapping Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-15 23:22 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 23:27 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-16 7:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-17 6:51 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-17 7:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-17 21:46 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-17 13:10 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 22:49 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-16 4:58 ` Itaru Kitayama [this message]
2026-09-16 7:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-16 10:08 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-20 1:33 ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-24 20:41 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqoh27cSs5gMHeAL@sm-arm-grace07 \
--to=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.