All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, brendan.jackman@linux.dev,
	ziy@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, henry.willard@oracle.com,
	david@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: do not boost watermarks in kdump capture kernels
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:50:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqrIvPY6iJOJ0mVf@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916112545.3707893-1-xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 07:25:45PM +0800, Yuanhe Shu wrote:
> A watermark boost is not confined to one watermark: wmark_pages() adds
> it to min, low and high alike, so every watermark check sees it,
> including should_reclaim_retry() and the last ditch ALLOC_WMARK_HIGH
> attempt in __alloc_pages_may_oom().  Once the boost exceeds the memory
> still free the allocator gives up and invokes the OOM killer, and a
> capture kernel that is still booting has nothing to kill: the boot
> panics and the vmcore is lost.
> 
> Seen on an arm64 machine with 64K pages, CONFIG_PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER=10
> (pageblock = 64M) and crashkernel=512M, running a distribution kernel
> based on 7.0.14.  A high order UNMOVABLE allocation fell back to a
> MOVABLE pageblock while the capture kernel was still in do_initcalls():
> 
>   Node 0 DMA free:68096kB boost:65536kB min:68160kB
>   low:68800kB high:69440kB managed:479168kB
>   Out of memory and no killable processes...
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: System is deadlocked on memory
> 
> The zone was not short of memory.  Subtracting the boost gives
> min:2624kB low:3264kB high:3904kB, so the 68096kB still free sat 17
> times above the high watermark and the allocator would not even have
> entered its slow path.  The boost supplied 65536kB of the 68160kB min
> and by itself put the zone 64kB under water.  It is that large because
> boost_watermark() clamps it with max(pageblock_nr_pages, max_boost);
> watermark_boost_factor alone would have allowed 5824kB.
> 
> Commit 14f69140ff9c ("mm: limit boost_watermark on small zones") already
> tried to protect capture kernels, but it infers them from the zone size
> and skips the boost only below four pageblocks.  arm64 64K pageblocks
> were 512M then, so the guard reached zones up to 2G;
> CONFIG_PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER can cap them at 64M, which shrinks the guard
> to zones under 256M and lets this 468M zone through.
> 
> kdump is a property of the kernel, not of the zone, so test for it
> directly.  A capture kernel exits within seconds and never uses the
> fragmentation avoidance the boost buys.  Normal kernels are unaffected:
> the size based check still covers their genuinely tiny zones.
> 
> Passing sysctl.vm.watermark_boost_factor=0 to the capture kernel does
> not cover this window: sysctl.* parameters are written through procfs
> by do_sysctl_args(), which runs after do_initcalls() where the panic
> above happened, and watermark_boost_factor has no early_param of its
> own.
> 
> Fixes: 1c30844d2dfe ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.0
> Cc: Henry Willard <henry.willard@oracle.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhe Shu <xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 11:25 [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: do not boost watermarks in kdump capture kernels Yuanhe Shu
2026-09-16 11:39 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-16 16:50 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqrIvPY6iJOJ0mVf@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=henry.willard@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiangzao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.