> Date: 2026-09-17 06:16:01+0000
> From: astian <astian@memeware.net>
>
> Signed-off-by: astian <astian@memeware.net>
> ---

Hi astian, Branden,

>  man/man2/ioperm.2 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man/man2/ioperm.2 b/man/man2/ioperm.2
> index e4a058164f6f..9b9aaf3840e2 100644
> --- a/man/man2/ioperm.2
> +++ b/man/man2/ioperm.2
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  .\"
>  .TH ioperm 2 (date) "Linux man-pages (unreleased)"
>  .SH NAME
> -ioperm \- set port input/output permissions
> +ioperm \- set input/output port permissions

If I'm understanding this proposal correctly, the fix is because I/O
is an adjective of port, not of permissions.  And then 'I/O port' would
be modifying permissions.

If my interpretation is correct, then I believe I/O would be separated
from 'port' by a hyphen, not a space.

Is this the correct interpretation of the proposed fix?

BTW, should we contract to I/O?

	ioperm \- set I/O-port permissions


Have a lovely day!
Alex

>  .SH LIBRARY
>  Standard C library
>  .RI ( libc ,\~ \-lc )
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>