From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:47:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqvvcEUo1u_6BqJS@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72659c27-3742-4760-8a5f-46d65ccf4012@kernel.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:11:39PM +0700, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > @@ -4290,6 +4290,19 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> >
> > fsp = sip->storep;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * A data-out buffer that does not hold all of the data that the
> > + * command asks for is written up to the last whole physical block
> > + * that it does hold, so that a partial physical block is never
> > + * written. The bytes that are left over are reported as a residual.
> > + */
> > + if (do_write) {
> > + u32 avail = (sdb->length - sg_skip) / sdebug_sector_size;
> > +
> > + if (avail < num)
> > + num = round_down(avail, 1U << sdebug_physblk_exp);
>
> Nope, that is not correct. physical sector unaligned writes are OK with regular
> disks. They are not for ZBC, but we should check that in
> check_zbc_access_params() I think.
Patch [4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zonedwrites
does add a check for SWR zones, and for SWR zone only, which errors out if
the write is not aligned to the physical block size.
However, in the case of a short data-out buffer, the request is valid, so I
don't think that check_zbc_access_params() is the right place for the above
check.
But you are right that the check in do_device_access() should be gated on
SWR zones as well...
Something like this:
@@ -4263,6 +4273,8 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
u64 block;
enum dma_data_direction dir;
struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb = &scp->sdb;
+ struct scsi_device *sdp = scp->device;
+ struct sdebug_dev_info *devip = (struct sdebug_dev_info *)sdp->hostdata;
u8 *fsp;
int i, total = 0;
@@ -4290,6 +4302,23 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
fsp = sip->storep;
+ /*
+ * For SWR zones, a data-out buffer that does not hold all of the data
+ * that the command asks for is written up to the last whole physical
+ * block that it does hold, so that a partial physical block is never
+ * written. The bytes that are left over are reported as a residual.
+ */
+ if (do_write && sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip)) {
+ struct sdeb_zone_state *zsp = zbc_zone(devip, lba);
+
+ if (zsp->z_type == ZBC_ZTYPE_SWR) {
+ u32 avail = (sdb->length - sg_skip) / sdebug_sector_size;
+
+ if (avail < num)
+ num = round_down(avail, 1U << sdebug_physblk_exp);
+ }
+ }
+
block = do_div(lba, sdebug_store_sectors);
/* Only allow 1x atomic write or multiple non-atomic writes at any given time */
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqvvcEUo1u_6BqJS@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.