All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Santos" <Jonathan.Santos@analog.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	dlechner@baylibre.com, michael.hennerich@analog.com,
	jonath4nns@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending in trigger_enable
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 13:24:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar5QVsQs2yrPqdxI@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0b918c9-2ede-4ff6-9ccf-6b819b972f38@sirena.org.uk>

On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 12:58:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 07:55:45AM +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Wed, 2026-09-30 at 14:09 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I'm not seeing anything here for the issue with ensuring posted writes
> > > are completed before we drop the lock?  The write may not be visible on
> > > enother CPU, we need a read from the controller or something.
> 
> > Just for my understanding, why would it be an issue? The trigger register seems to
> > only be accessible from the trigger callbacks which are protected by a lock where we
> > have implied barriers. Im sure I'm missing what can go wrong here :)
> 
> Are you sure that's true for mutexes?  I thought they only covered
> memory, not device stuff, but ICBW.

Oh right, likely not a full barrier

- Nuno Sá




  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30  2:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30  2:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30  2:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending in trigger_enable Jonathan Santos
2026-09-30 13:09   ` Mark Brown
2026-10-01  6:55     ` Nuno Sá
2026-10-01 11:58       ` Mark Brown
2026-10-01 12:24         ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2026-09-30 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix stale SYNC IRQ pending Nuno Sá

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ar5QVsQs2yrPqdxI@nsa \
    --to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Santos@analog.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jonath4nns@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.