From: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
"Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] selftests/bpf: Use the new NMI_BITS definition
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:13:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar5cbL_ywJVP9m_s@MacBook-0RXW5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001082519.16195-4-boqun@kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Boqun Feng wrote:
> The definition of NMI_BITS was out of sync after the introduction of
> HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS, hence adjust it.
>
> Reported-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> index 2893bf06ff25..4bf7390994bf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
Per sashiko's report, seems I need the following to make it work:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 4bf7390994bf..94143cf0ab0d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -367,6 +367,9 @@ extern int bpf_cgroup_read_xattr(struct cgroup *cgroup, const char *name__str,
extern int bpf_sock_read_xattr(struct socket *sock, const char *name__str,
struct bpf_dynptr *value_p) __weak __ksym;
+extern bool CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS __kconfig __weak;
+#define IS_ENABLED(cfg) (cfg)
+
#define PREEMPT_BITS 8
#define SOFTIRQ_BITS 8
#define HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS 8
?
[Cc Leon and Alexi]
Regards,
Boqun
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ extern int bpf_sock_read_xattr(struct socket *sock, const char *name__str,
> #define SOFTIRQ_BITS 8
> #define HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS 8
> #define HARDIRQ_BITS 4
> -#define NMI_BITS 1
> +#define NMI_BITS (1 + 3*IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS))
>
> #define PREEMPT_SHIFT 0
> #define SOFTIRQ_SHIFT (PREEMPT_SHIFT + PREEMPT_BITS)
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 8:25 [PATCH v2 0/5] Improvements and fixes on SpinLockIrq patch series Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] irq: Make refcount_interrupt kunit test selectable Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] irq: Add {over,under}flow detection for local_interrupt_{enable,disable} Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] selftests/bpf: Use the new NMI_BITS definition Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 13:13 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2026-10-02 6:24 ` Leon Hwang
2026-10-02 6:41 ` Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] irq: Explain better on NMI_MASK overflow condition Boqun Feng
2026-10-01 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] irq: Add max local_interrupt_disable() nesting level kunit test case Boqun Feng
2026-10-02 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Improvements and fixes on SpinLockIrq patch series Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-02 10:30 ` Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar5cbL_ywJVP9m_s@MacBook-0RXW5 \
--to=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.