From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
luizcap@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>
Subject: Re: hunting memory corruption bug in 6.18.x
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 21:40:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar63St2LBfCdyhwj@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar1Xl7PE2rcoT9h3@pcnci.linuxbox.cz>
Hello again,
the good (?) news is, in the meantime we got another crash on different machine
and I have a kdump including complete vmcore. This one was 6.18.53
here are some details:
Hardware: Supermicro AS-2024US-TRT / H12DSU-iN, BIOS 3.5 (2025-09-22). Dual-socket AMD EPYC 7343 16-Core, 32 CPUs, 1024 GB RAM.
analyzed with crash + matching vmlinux debuginfo:
Oops:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfffffff0c930038
RIP: __d_lookup+0x4a/0xc0
Comm: systemd PID: 1274600 CPU: 23
Call trace:
__d_lookup
lookup_fast
walk_component
link_path_walk
path_openat
do_filp_open
do_sys_openat2
__x64_sys_openat
do_syscall_64
Exception frame registers:
RAX: 0fffffff0c930020 RBX: 0fffffff0c930020 RCX: 000000000000000b
RDX: ffff985ffd223600 RSI: ffffb18962823d70 RDI: ffff989ddf09b5c0
RBP: 000000005560450b R8: 000000007fffffff R9: fefefefefefefeff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 93c3d2eb02a31dda R12: ffff989ddf09b5c0
R13: ffff989ddf09b5c0 R14: ffffb18962823d70 R15: 0000000000000000
Faulting instruction (cmp %ebp,0x18(%rbx)) dereferences RBX+0x18. RBX held
the non-canonical value 0x0fffffff0c930020, giving fault address
0x0fffffff0c930038. __d_lookup was walking the d_hash (hlist_bl) bucket;
RBX was the node pointer being dereferenced.
Observations from the vmcore:
The faulting value 0x0fffffff0c930020 is non-canonical and is not a mapped
kernel address:
crash> kmem 0x0fffffff0c930020
kmem: cannot determine page for fffffff0c930020
fffffff0c930020: physical address not found in mem map
The dentry being looked up (RDI/R12/R13 = 0xffff989ddf09b5c0) is intact and
well-formed:
name "app.slice", len 9, d_name.hash 0xCE973022 (consistent)
d_op = kernfs_dops; valid d_parent, d_inode, d_sb
d_hash.next = 0x0 (this node is the end of its bucket chain)
The target dentry and its hash chain in the dump show no corruption; the
chain terminates cleanly.
No page migration, compaction, or THP activity was in progress on any CPU
at panic. "bt -a" filtered for migrate*/compact*/khugepaged/kcompactd/
kswapd/split_huge*/folio*/d_move/rename returned nothing.
Automatic NUMA balancing was disabled at crash time (read from kernel memory):
crash> p sysctl_numa_balancing_mode
$ = 0
Top-level (PMD) transparent hugepage policy was "never" at crash time:
crash> p/x transparent_hugepage_flags
$ = 0x1c0
Bits set: 6 (DEFRAG_REQ_MADV), 7 (DEFRAG_KHUGEPAGED), 8 (USE_ZERO_PAGE).
Bits 0 (TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG) and 1 (REQ_MADV_FLAG) are clear, i.e.
sysfs enabled = never. Per-order mTHP controls (huge_anon_orders_*) were not
inspected for this dump, so mTHP state is not asserted here.
No MCE/EDAC/hardware-error records are present in the kernel log for this host.
I can provide the full vmcore and the matching vmlinux/debuginfo on request, and
run further crash queries against it.
not sure if this is of any help?
with regards
nik
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 08:40:23PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> (CC Paolo Bonzini)
>
> Hello Lorenzo,
>
> >
> > Yeah 6.18.15 is expected, I'd not say reverting is really worthwhile honestly,
> > given what you've observed previously.
> yes, I wasn't available at the time he was dealing with that..
>
>
> >
> > Maybe worth checking if commit 26505e1b5b54 ("KVM: SVM: make svm_flush_tlb_gva
> > do a full asid flush if NPT enabled") helps in that case?
> sure, I'll do that.. however, the patch doesn't apply cleanly on top of 6.18.54 at
> all.. what do you guys recommend, is it OK to adjust the patch to this kernel
> (I have to admit I'm able to do that, but without any deep knowledge of the subsystem)
> or do you recommend to apply some of the previous patches?
>
> tried going through them, but its ~134 commits affecting svm.c between
> v6.18 and 26505e1b5b54
>
> cheers
>
> nik
>
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Lorenzo
> >
>
> --
> Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
> technický ředitel
>
> +420 591 166 214
> +420 777 093 799
> nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz
>
> www.linuxbox.cz
>
--
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
technický ředitel
+420 591 166 214
+420 777 093 799
nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz
www.linuxbox.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 8:48 hunting memory corruption bug in 6.18.x Nikola Ciprich
2026-09-25 10:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-25 12:13 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-26 5:58 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-09-26 9:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-28 9:05 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-09-29 19:11 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-09-30 9:07 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-30 18:40 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-01 19:40 ` Nikola Ciprich [this message]
2026-10-01 22:21 ` David Laight
2026-10-02 9:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-02 14:55 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-02 19:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-04 18:40 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-05 11:25 ` Rik van Riel
2026-10-05 19:02 ` Nikola Ciprich
[not found] ` <20261005132113.43548696@pumpkin>
2026-10-05 19:25 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-08 12:29 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-08 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-10-08 20:48 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-09 8:00 ` David Laight
2026-10-12 11:43 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-02 22:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-10-04 18:45 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-05 10:58 ` Rik van Riel
2026-10-05 18:05 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-09-26 16:02 ` Luiz Capitulino
2026-09-28 8:47 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-04 22:20 ` Rik van Riel
2026-10-05 9:31 ` Nikola Ciprich
2026-10-05 8:31 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar63St2LBfCdyhwj@pcnci.linuxbox.cz \
--to=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.