From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, kch@nvidia.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gjoyce@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmet: defer setting ns->enabled to false in nvmet_ns_disable()
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 05:20:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar8h9B_P6fZhtWPy@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04909105-bcbd-4b89-af41-ad761aaa9af2@linux.ibm.com>
On Oct 01, 2026 / 17:12, Nilay Shroff wrote:
[...]
> > Recent blktests-ci trial runs for nvme-7.3 branch reported failure of nvme/052
> > [*]. It is required to repeat the test case 3 to 20 times to recreate the
> > failure on my test system. I bisected and find this patch is the trigger of the
> > failure.
> >
> > Nilay, may I ask you to take a look in the failure? I'm not sure if this should
> > be addressed in kernel side of blktests side.
>
> Thanks for the report! I looked into the failure and I think I found the root cause.
> I couldn't reproduce it on my system, but I see there is a narrow race window that can
> potentially trigger the observed failure.
>
> I don't think this is a new race introduced by this patch. However, the changes in this
> patch may have altered the timing enough to make the race easier to trigger.
>
> In nvmet_ns_enable(), we currently queue the asynchronous namespace-change event
> before setting ns->enabled and the corresponding NVMET_NS_ENABLED xarray mark.
> Therefore, if the asynchronous namespace-change event is received and processed
> by the host before the namespace is fully enabled on the target, the host may not
> find the namespace while scanning the active namespace list.
>
> To close this race, I think we should send the namespace-change notification only
> after the namespace has been fully enabled in nvmet_ns_enable(). In particular,
> we can move nvmet_ns_changed() after setting ns->enabled, the NVMET_NS_ENABLED
> xarray mark, and NVMET_NS_IO_LIVE.
>
> Could you please try the following change on your test system and let me know if
> it fixes the failure? If this resolves the issue, I'll send a formal patch:
(snip)
Thank you for this swift action. I applied the fix trial change on top of the
kernel at the nvme-7.3 branch (git hash 4a5e49ba0abb), and confirmed the failure
goes away by repeating the test case nvme/052 one hundred times. Good :)
When you post the fix as the formal patch, please feel free to add,
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 16:27 [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: fix subtle race in I/O processing and ns configuration Nilay Shroff
2026-09-18 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmet: defer setting ns->enabled to false in nvmet_ns_disable() Nilay Shroff
2026-09-21 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-01 5:55 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-10-01 11:42 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-10-02 3:20 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2026-09-18 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet: don't allow I/O admission after percpu ns reference is killed Nilay Shroff
2026-09-21 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-22 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: fix subtle race in I/O processing and ns configuration Keith Busch
2026-09-22 15:04 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ar8h9B_P6fZhtWPy@shinmob \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.