All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: bestswngs@gmail.com
Cc: fw@strlen.de, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, phil@nwl.cc, xmei5@asu.edu,
	co+ee5e50ef2670e5f4@bugs.sh
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip transaction elements during GC
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:29:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arEjJkGYX4Q-EbhK@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arEeRLnELoQYlEur@chamomile>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 02:08:40PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:08:22AM +0800, bestswngs@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Since nft_set_commit_update() runs set commit callbacks before processing
> > NEWSETELEM transactions, nft_rbtree_gc_scan() can observe elements added by
> > the transaction being committed.
> > 
> > The scan records an interval end in rbe_end without checking the element's
> > transaction state. A later, unrelated expired start then moves both
> > elements to the expired list.
> >
> > The synchronous GC queue can free the new end
> > element before the transaction subsequently activates it, causing a
> > use-after-free.
> > 
> > Only consider elements that are fully active in both generations. This
> > keeps transaction-state elements out of the GC scan and preserves interval
> > pairing across skipped elements.
> >
> > KASAN reports:
> > 
> >   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nft_setelem_activate
> >   nft_setelem_activate net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7047
> >   nf_tables_commit net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:11137
> > 
> >   Allocated by task 130:
> >   nft_set_elem_init net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:6794
> >   nft_add_set_elem net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7523
> > 
> >   Freed by task 130:
> >   nft_trans_gc_trans_free net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:10506
> >   rcu_core kernel/rcu/tree.c:2919
> >
> > Fixes: 1e3b9e1c77fe ("netfilter: nf_tables: call set ops .commit when building new ruleset blob")
> > Reported-by: <co+ee5e50ef2670e5f4@bugs.sh>
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> > index 9894832281c4b..12431b55752fb 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> > @@ -900,6 +900,8 @@ static void nft_rbtree_gc_scan(struct nft_set *set)
> >  		next = rb_next(node);
> >  
> >  		rbe = rb_entry(node, struct nft_rbtree_elem, node);
> > +		if (!nft_set_elem_active(&rbe->ext, NFT_GENMASK_ANY))
> > +			continue;
> >  
> >  		/* elements are reversed in the rbtree for historical reasons,
> >  		 * from highest to lowest value, that is why end element is
> 
> Maybe simply set rbe_end to NULL when rbe is found and is not
> expired?
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> index 9894832281c4..a9f2ae3c91cf 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> @@ -909,8 +909,10 @@ static void nft_rbtree_gc_scan(struct nft_set *set)
>                         rbe_end = rbe;
>                         continue;
>                 }
> -               if (!__nft_set_elem_expired(&rbe->ext, tstamp))
> +               if (!__nft_set_elem_expired(&rbe->ext, tstamp)) {
> +                       rbe_end = NULL;
>                         continue;
> +               }
>  
>                 /* end element needs to be removed first, it has
>                  * no timeout extension.

My proposed chunk is not correct, it still allows for the problem to
happen.

Maybe restrict this to:

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
index 9894832281c4..bc331c6ae339 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
@@ -905,7 +905,8 @@ static void nft_rbtree_gc_scan(struct nft_set *set)
                 * from highest to lowest value, that is why end element is
                 * always visited before the start element.
                 */
-               if (nft_rbtree_interval_end(rbe)) {
+               if (nft_rbtree_interval_end(rbe) &&
+                   nft_set_elem_active(&rbe->ext, NFT_GENMASK_ANY)) {
                        rbe_end = rbe;
                        continue;
                }

for symmetry with:

commit 60c0c230c6f046da536d3df8b39a20b9a9fd6af0
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Wed Feb 7 18:49:51 2024 +0100
 
    netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip end interval element from gc


But I suspect this is leaving stale (expired) overlapping intervals in
the set when building it from nft_rbtree_commit(), so the fix still
looks incomplete me.

I want to have a close look and make a test case for this, this is not
well covered by tests.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21  2:08 [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip transaction elements during GC bestswngs
2026-09-21 12:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-21 12:29   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arEjJkGYX4Q-EbhK@chamomile \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
    --cc=co+ee5e50ef2670e5f4@bugs.sh \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.