All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert streams from RB tree to XArray
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:24:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGEXU2GqmYYBBjb@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-smmu-shared-sid-v2-1-4b656ce68178@nxp.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 07:35:00PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Replace the smmu->streams RB tree with an XArray for SID ->
> arm_smmu_stream lookups. The existing streams_mutex serialises all
> accesses (both xa_store/xa_erase and xa_load), protecting the lifetime
> of returned pointers against concurrent arm_smmu_remove_master()
> without requiring RCU grace periods. A mutex (rather than xa_lock) is
> needed because several paths sleep while the lock is held:
> dmam_alloc_coherent(GFP_KERNEL) in arm_smmu_init_sid_strtab(), and
> down_read() inside iommu_report_device_fault().

The commit message reads very unconvincing.

The first paragraph starts with an action "replace" without giving
a clear reason for the action.

> This removes the RB tree comparators, the rb_node from

Then the second paragraph repeats the action...

> arm_smmu_stream, and simplifies duplicate-SID handling for bridged PCI
> devices.

... and slightly mentions "simplifies". Maybe it should write about
why this is necessary and how xarray would simplify vs RB tree?

Nicolin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21 11:34 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared Stream IDs Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 11:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert streams from RB tree to XArray Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 19:24   ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-09-22 14:04     ` Peng Fan
2026-09-22 16:56       ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 12:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared SIDs in insert/remove_master Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 23:15   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-22 14:13     ` Peng Fan
2026-09-22 15:52       ` Robin Murphy
2026-09-22 17:47         ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 12:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Group aliasing devices into the same IOMMU group Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-21 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Wire up shared-SID STE ordering and feature gating Peng Fan (OSS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arGEXU2GqmYYBBjb@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.