From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Tenzin Ukyab" <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@meta.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat.
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:49:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGYSbQ97ORDvSBl@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920195633.3033620-7-kuniyu@google.com>
On 09/20, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() were added to parse skb and
> adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat dynamically to suppress unnecessary wakeups.
>
> Let's add a new kfunc to set sk->sk_rcvlowat.
>
> Negative values are clamped to INT_MAX, consistent with SO_RCVLOWAT.
>
> For enqueue_rcvq(), wakeup is set to false because:
>
> * tcp_data_ready() is always called after the hooks in
> tcp_queue_rcv() and tcp_ofo_queue().
>
> * when tcp_fastopen_add_skb() is called for TFO SYN, the socket is
> not yet accept()ed, and when called for TFO SYN+ACK, the socket
> is woken up by sk->sk_state_change() anyway.
>
> For dequeue_rcvq(), wakeup is set to true because tcp_data_ready()
> is not called in that path.
>
> An alternative would be to support bpf_setsockopt() for these
> hooks.
>
> However, that approach involves excessive conditionals and an
> unnecessary memcpy(), costs we do not want to pay for every skb
> in the TCP fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> index b0e14b54917e..3768b1440eb7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> @@ -359,8 +359,62 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_tcp_ops_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int rcvlowat,
> + const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> +{
> + u32 moff = aux->attach_st_ops_member_off;
> + bool wakeup = false;
> +
> + if (moff == offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_ops, dequeue_rcvq))
> + wakeup = true;
[..]
> + if (rcvlowat < 0)
> + rcvlowat = INT_MAX;
nit: the same check exists in setsockopt. Any reason not to move it
to your new __tcp_set_rcvlowat ?
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 19:56 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() for bpf_tcp_ops Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 21:05 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:01 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-20 21:12 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 20:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 21:09 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 20:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 21:10 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-09-21 21:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-22 7:29 ` Clément Léger
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-22 23:14 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arGYSbQ97ORDvSBl@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cleger@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.