All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] keyctl30: Check module is presented before loading
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:50:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arJ5l2SxNgKMMX-j@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922112916.GB2191017@pevik>

Hi!
> > >  	{"CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS", "sch_ingress"},
> > >  	{"CONFIG_NET_CLS_MATCHALL", "cls_matchall"},
> > >  	{"CONFIG_NET_ACT_PEDIT", "act_pedit"},
> > > +	{"CONFIG_PKCS8_PRIVATE_KEY_PARSER", "pcks8_key_parser"},
> 
> > I think that this is still cleaner, this way we skip the test even
> > before we start running it.
> 
> Yeah, exit early + having it in the metadata is better - feel free to post the
> above as a patch and we refuse this patch.
> 
> After release thinking:
> Thinking it twice having a separate metadata for "direct" module loading was
> good (the functionality we replaced by kconfig). Why? Now we need to
> 1) load module manually in the test
> 2) manual module loading is hidden in metadata behind kernel config (tester see
> that in the test output, but it's not obvious in the metadata).

It's more subtle than this, in most cases kernel actually loads the
module automatically when the functionality is used (e.g. you create a
socket and kernel loads the module with the particular socket support).
The cases where the module needs to be loaded are quite rare. It's never
unloaded though, so maybe we should attempt that too (if it wasn't
loaded and was loaded because of the test).

> Sure, we don't want to revert that whole big patchset. But maybe we could
> consider to
> 1) call tst_module_load() based on config_module_map() instead doing it
> in the test

We can do that, but I would only do so if it's actually needed, so that
the module autoload is tested as well. For that we would probably need
to add a needs_load to the config to module mapping table.

> 2) print this mapping in the metadata (that would require struct config_module_map
> being accessible also by metadata/metaparse.c.
>
> > Maybe we should attempt to auto-generate the
> > table for all CONFIG_* variables used in LTP.
> 
> Sure, that's a good idea. Useful would be some script similar to updating
> sycalls numbers. With the only exception: don't delete old modules (modules can
> be deleted, but still used by supported kernels).

As long as we have complete list of CONFIG_* variables from the tests,
which can be easily extracted from the test, we know which modules we
need mapping for. No need to keep anything that isn't in that set.

> > Also keyctl23.c and keyctl29.c have tst_modprobe("x509_key_parser",
> > NULL); So we need fix/mappping for x509_key_parser too.
> 
> Yeah, I also noted that + cve-2026-46331.c (all Andrea's agent based code,
> we should teach agent about the differences).

There are also tests that do tst_cmd("modprobe", ...) these should be
fixed as well (git grep '"modprobe"').

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 10:58 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] keyctl30: Check module is presented before loading Petr Vorel
2026-09-22 11:05 ` Petr Vorel
2026-09-22 11:09 ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-09-22 11:29   ` Petr Vorel
2026-09-22 12:50     ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2026-09-22 13:50       ` Petr Vorel
2026-09-22 14:17         ` Cyril Hrubis
2026-09-22 16:41           ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arJ5l2SxNgKMMX-j@yuki.lan \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.