From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
phil@nwl.cc, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
kaber@trash.net, vega@nebusec.ai, caoruide123@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 1/1] netfilter: ecache: bound destroy event redelivery
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:03:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arLtL4Azj6d7Juxe@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48840876b129e0094fbd8048e96fb6e3fae51055.1787158072.git.vega.cover-letter@nebusec.ai>
Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai> wrote:
> From: Ruide Cao <caoruide123@gmail.com>
>
> A conntrack whose destroy event cannot be delivered is kept on the
> per-netns ecache list while the workqueue retries the notification.
> The worker stops at the first failure and retries every 10 ms without
> a lifetime limit. A listener that enables NETLINK_BROADCAST_ERROR and
> never drains its receive queue can therefore retain conntracks and
> keep the worker busy indefinitely.
Yes, that's by design. This feature intentionally blocks new
conntracks.
> + if (!cnet->ecache.retry_deadline)
> + cnet->ecache.retry_deadline = jiffies + ECACHE_RETRY_TIMEOUT;
> +
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, cnet->ecache.retry_deadline)) {
> + hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_safe(h, n, &cnet->ecache.dying_list,
> + hnnode) {
> + struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> +
> + hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode);
> + hlist_nulls_add_head(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode,
> + &evicted_list);
> + }
> + ret = STATE_DONE;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I doubt this is correct. Userspace that can deal with missing destroy
events SHOULD NOT enable reliable event delivery mode.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 17:39 [PATCH nf 0/1] netfilter: ecache: bound destroy event redelivery Ren Wei
2026-09-22 17:39 ` [PATCH nf 1/1] " Ren Wei
2026-09-22 21:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arLtL4Azj6d7Juxe@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=caoruide123@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=weir@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.