From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64/boot: Disable trapping of PMZR_EL0 writes to EL2
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:31:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arMBpmlUi1Hm9hIB@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTx8JsXfrjKUbhhrfSmFPrWxyYaTbKqMeYAJPt-vqGfLvA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:09:37PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:47:58 +0100, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > We can trim 3 instructions from this by using the read-trap bits as the
> > starting point for the write-trap bits, like below. It also makes clear
> > the point that most of our trap bits are symmetrical for read and write.
>
> I did consider that, and went the other way for two reasons.
>
> The read side has three bits with no write-side counterpart
> (nPMSSDATA, nSPMDEVAFF_EL1, nSPMID), so copying x0 into x2 writes ones
> into three RES0 bits of HDFGWTR2_EL2. Harmless today, but it's this
> bug in reverse: the first revision that defines one of those positions
> in the write register turns the copy into a silent behaviour change.
> Building each mask from its own register's names can't do that.
My thinking was that we could have a third block, but...
> It also matches __init_el2_fgt, which already keeps x0 and x2 apart
> for HDFGRTR_EL2 and HDFGWTR_EL2. And even in that form the copy would
> have to sit just before the msr_s, after the SPE block, or
> nPMSDSFR_EL1 only lands in x0.
new feature-specific initialization blocks will make this an absolute
mess. So I agree, this is the right fix.
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Best,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 18:14 [PATCH v1] arm64/boot: Disable trapping of PMZR_EL0 writes to EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-09-22 19:47 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-22 21:09 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-22 22:31 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-09-23 6:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-23 13:00 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arMBpmlUi1Hm9hIB@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.