All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,  lkp@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	Jakub Kacinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm/secretmem] 97d34aa65c: stress-ng.secretmem.ops_per_sec 99.5% regression
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:19:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arN9UtxVQpWqTZ8C@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ea6e90a-e2fb-4793-b6ea-e292388bdfdf@kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 08:35:47AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 9/23/26 03:00, kernel test robot wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed a 99.5% regression of stress-ng.secretmem.ops_per_sec on:
> >
> > commit: 97d34aa65c29cca85e3e9050f4c936389b38a054 ("mm/secretmem: properly account locked pages") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> Well maybe there is some inefficiency that can be fixed (haven't checked)
> but if it's the cost for proper accounting then so be it? I doubt creating
> secretmem pages is something userspace would have to do intensively enough
> to matter.

Yeah, exactly.

This isn't something that should be benchmarked, this is possibly the most
ludicrious benchmark I've ever seen :)

If establishing a secretmem region is on your hot path you have engineered your
software wrong.

This is effectively a security flaw so I'm afraid must remain.

--
Cheers, Lorenzo


      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  1:00 [linus:master] [mm/secretmem] 97d34aa65c: stress-ng.secretmem.ops_per_sec 99.5% regression kernel test robot
2026-09-23  6:35 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-23  7:19   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arN9UtxVQpWqTZ8C@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.