From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, andy@kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: serialize buffer teardown with mode claims
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:24:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arTeK0QadzWkI6jH@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921062421.64647-1-kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 03:24:21PM +0900, Jinseob Kim wrote:
> Buffer-mode claims hold mlock to guarantee that the device remains in
> buffer mode until the claim is released. Normal buffer updates take
> info_exist_lock followed by mlock in iio_update_buffers().
>
> However, iio_device_unregister() disables and deactivates all buffers
> without taking mlock. This can invalidate buffer state, including
> active_scan_mask, while a buffer-mode claim is held.
>
> Take mlock in iio_disable_all_buffers() so that unregister honors the
> mode-claim lifetime guarantee. The info_exist_lock -> mlock ordering
> matches iio_update_buffers().
>
> Fixes: 0a8565425afd ("iio: core: introduce iio_device_{claim|release}_buffer_mode() APIs")
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 2c9ec93dff47..d60bad5492e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1377,6 +1377,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_update_buffers);
>
> void iio_disable_all_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock);
> +
> iio_disable_buffers(indio_dev);
> iio_buffer_deactivate_all(indio_dev);
> }
>
> base-commit: dceba8e581e3e8f475da0efbd7a73f3d9524ddd2
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 6:24 [PATCH] iio: buffer: serialize buffer teardown with mode claims Jinseob Kim
2026-09-23 7:38 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-24 8:24 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2026-09-25 2:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arTeK0QadzWkI6jH@nsa \
--to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kimjinseob88@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.