From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3353DC9832A for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xADlA-0006kd-PO; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:47:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xADkn-0006jc-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:46:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xADkl-0007Lc-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:46:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1790372807; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+dGbPcdVKokRLIaIjV+cDWElamxsg7FULyz4wO6e4F0=; b=ZYhyPFiJ8djzHeJmr4ymJ+HZzFzL3dzYLwfWKgWq07lGMKHAYAa+8cbSLuooEj6xTN1dP0 kv/5oD+pFYfXpgAPlLrLiq8StD3kmnN0OdugtEuh2J/y/DLzfW/f2UNfoS8nEVVOXeX2Tv CPsqDOu3S7LZoHkFd/Tsd8rYK3cJq7k= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-301-Uw9uac78MaaChM4WtxFydw-1; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:46:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Uw9uac78MaaChM4WtxFydw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Uw9uac78MaaChM4WtxFydw_1790372802 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DACB1956053; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.3]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E2B71956086; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:46:37 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Eric Farman Cc: Kevin Wolf , Hanna Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Matthew Rosato Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] iotests fixes Message-ID: References: <20260925194409.716498-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260925194409.716498-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20260616 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 09:44:04PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote: > Hi Kevin, Hanna, > > Here is a new version of iotests fixes from our s390x systems. > They aren't related, just came up walking through the failures. > > I saw you asked Eric Blake about the nbd-in-qcow2-chain patch. > I left it as-is, but I am fine with skipping it if that's easier. > > I added a new patch at the end of this series, which skips the last remaining > failure I can create out-of-the-box on s390. I had hoped that I could get > that one to work, but it doesn't appear to be trivial. Series: Reviewed-by: Eric Blake -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. Virtualization: qemu.org | libguestfs.org