All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, bentiss@kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: microsoft: cancel the rumble work on removal
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 22:24:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arn5XTGp7XIOmdB2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260927011220.4193-1-danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>

Hi Danish,

On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 08:12:20PM -0500, Danish Khateeb wrote:
> Commit 1cfc77a64b71 ("HID: microsoft: move FF initialization to
> .input_configured()") removed ms_remove_ff() along with ms_init_ff(),
> and with it the only cancel_work_sync() of ff_worker. Nothing waits for
> the rumble work any more before devres frees struct ms_data and the
> report buffer that the work fills in.
> 
> Removing the device queues the work itself: hid_hw_stop() unregisters
> the input device, and if an effect is playing, input_ff_flush() stops
> it through ms_play_effect(). The work usually runs before remove()
> returns, but nothing guarantees it.
> 
> Cancel the work again after hid_hw_stop(), when the input device is gone
> and nothing can queue it any more. Initialize it in ms_probe(), so that
> it can be cancelled for devices without force feedback too.
> 
> Fixes: 1cfc77a64b71 ("HID: microsoft: move FF initialization to .input_configured()")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Danish Khateeb <danishkhateeb03@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Tested in QEMU on a next-20260925 KASAN kernel with uhid devices bound
>     to hid-microsoft: an Xbox Wireless Controller (BT 045e:0b13) destroyed
>     while a rumble effect was playing and its evdev node was open (20
>     cycles), a Natural Ergonomic 4000 (no force feedback, 5 cycles), then
>     rmmod. Tracing shows the removal queuing ff_worker. There are no
>     warnings with or without this patch: I could not reproduce the
>     use-after-free, as the work always ran before remove() returned. A W=1
>     build is clean.
> 
>  drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
> index a7d3493a6141..1b527954937d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c
> @@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ static int ms_input_configured(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hidinp
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	ms->hdev = hdev;
> -	INIT_WORK(&ms->ff_worker, ms_ff_worker);
>  
>  	ms->output_report_dmabuf = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev,
>  						sizeof(struct xb1s_ff_report),
> @@ -358,6 +357,7 @@ static int ms_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	ms->quirks = quirks;
> +	INIT_WORK(&ms->ff_worker, ms_ff_worker);
>  
>  	hid_set_drvdata(hdev, ms);
>  
> @@ -384,7 +384,11 @@ static int ms_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
>  }
>  static void ms_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
>  {
> +	struct ms_data *ms = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +
>  	hid_hw_stop(hdev);
> +	/* Unregistering the input device stops rumble, which queues the work */
> +	cancel_work_sync(&ms->ff_worker);

I think this is too late: by this time the hardware is shut off so if
the work is still running and tries to access the hardware there may be
failures.

I think I will add support for "slow" effect playback to memoryless
handling so that the drivers do not need to worry about managing their
private work items.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-27  1:12 [PATCH] HID: microsoft: cancel the rumble work on removal Danish Khateeb
2026-09-28  5:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arn5XTGp7XIOmdB2@google.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=danishkhateeb03@gmail.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.