From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: arm64: ID register finalisation fixes
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:02:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arxDf3AHHjKCv6rD@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-kvm-arm64-idreg-final-v4-0-75296dde994d@kernel.org>
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 12:57:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> While looking at some feature enablement I noticed that there are some
> scenarios where we can end up with an inconsistently configured vCPU due
> to finalizing configuration based on ID registers before we have blocked
> writes to the ID registers. This series aims to clean up these issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Rebase onto v7.3-rc3.
> - Add a lockdep assert.
> - Update Fuad's LLM tag.
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260901-kvm-arm64-idreg-final-v3-0-a0ffa06fa872@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebase onto v7.3-rc1.
> - Explain why KVM_ARCH_FLAG_ID_REGS_INITIALIZED is not reused.
> - Pull in Fuad's test cases.
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260803-kvm-arm64-idreg-final-v2-0-d7d7e4efc640@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Also replace the kvm_vm_has_ran_once() usage in kvm_set_vm_id_rg() and
> kvm_vm_finalize_sys_regs() with kvm_id_regs_final().
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260731-kvm-arm64-idreg-final-v1-0-3de2a5616dc6@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Fuad Tabba (1):
> KVM: arm64: selftests: Check ID regs are immutable after a failed run
>
> Mark Brown (2):
> KVM: arm64: Finalize guest-wide sysregs prior to per-vCPU sysregs
> KVM: arm64: Block ID register changes after we rely on the values
I'm not too terribly jazzed about testing the relative ordering of
errors in the selftest, but I see why we need to do it. Otherwise,
everything looks good.
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 11:57 [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: arm64: ID register finalisation fixes Mark Brown
2026-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: arm64: Finalize guest-wide sysregs prior to per-vCPU sysregs Mark Brown
2026-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: arm64: Block ID register changes after we rely on the values Mark Brown
2026-09-30 8:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-29 11:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Check ID regs are immutable after a failed run Mark Brown
2026-09-29 23:02 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-09-30 8:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: arm64: ID register finalisation fixes Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arxDf3AHHjKCv6rD@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.