From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vk1-f182.google.com (mail-vk1-f182.google.com [209.85.221.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142A73FF8A5 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792000163; cv=none; b=YeOEkXz7gahZJfKSgNagIqCeIQuvHPuaMQ3oWnUZKkQ3M/I5B8SfCHFatTgSHrpGhMoKSo/pOtEOEvmsSjovOTwdW9yGisrISfjXzQLdfzmv1oD6en3Opo2eaD348Z2t+8xjQJmu93hoWtcygA7tHCXBJMRu8PtANFwt51eK31I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792000163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BGXYcyYxa3zL7lmoVTo5LwRWdRsUGemgsedWrQRhnGs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Md5jSW/0TRH1md4M/2BZpicZDLH5VDShNt6AD0n/4PGzJlEp8RHFlzqOVepOSHFk4vHkbD8tVoYGiOPwcj2oxlHSQIzNKecu4KVcPZev0GO/I9IfUD9/3OrbXvp+lYOsnm7U67fIDwVM9Cvae5QN3bo8fGASiOLGgRCN9lAmFs8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre.com header.i=@baylibre.com header.b=emlqJXnW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre.com header.i=@baylibre.com header.b="emlqJXnW" Received: by mail-vk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-5e23be41cf8so2065456e0c.2 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre.com; s=google; t=1792000160; x=1792604960; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=f8kzZmMj7iTn0G7hnvHiCslW4uHhA/2DjEeib3MziLQ=; b=emlqJXnWFaFLN/Xjc3C/ao1Go4dvabQ+VBB86lCaBOcu4kN1z+yJLm8liHL4T+r17r lcdxRuzhiA64jYLJSQ3NsxVfGi1shTucTdUf6xdKmkYNnUYDOf8LYpJiM9qzpGMNc4FE QHt5mKX66+UU2So/sxYmze1puecIVoEvG6ux7104t5zvSIzZKP4PhzVtvKEQMO9/G7/J IYK3MFLIjst/gQj3R4o6pKi3ZXsKeOXhmixTm6PsCPFaFOOJQRKkGF2Ee8mKbFMf/2ig qjKCMK1xKgxZoNyzn3xUhHj60+SNcEefTxfbzueqibRt7GKCOsc2iuZRaDFGeHi8y8Wk WFEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792000160; x=1792604960; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to:content-type; bh=f8kzZmMj7iTn0G7hnvHiCslW4uHhA/2DjEeib3MziLQ=; b=N0k2OiwDw7KQyKHrNvAPiHHkUoBN6lnSxPOdLPcSqND9rXKOXehCFEn38eFraZ+7Jl aqMPfzUsMh7vjFDevgGQv7C3MwlhIqUt5eD7uDQczqVfZzDHW8oZoP2J/XJiYhc6yuNI v7+BBFzz+EV5vQjJ7zB0ED0pTSPjVef8vorIUFziMQvg34cYrMaXz3K496ys8PZUAY/G HTe+ZMFMbPJm3lRtu6mWqnvkgedtu25OIUkNsKIre4zF36BLdyWHkDYGdxrEG552iEgq 10MvxiCGsgqe7Mmd4/Rj1u2e4y6fCODDfaIxmUJODJrLJLcMgI2VBvsimXsYiPM9yqja SJEg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvByRquzFuXdvnxNyOKjZ4exFO5jJhuRwP+nRF+EGsmUZ9rP9hyQbx9t6AqJ5TanI58w4KD3Nrcg=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIA1W+/bj+5xzLpjcnxXh2ZBloxj62RixSv/eKSLcvaEvtpXHAG pO29TIoNzSKcZRzGaf0NBnoU2y4OA0ymJ116PlA22wdR3rSDeOE+BcHUX+CoPWPKln8= X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0kk4p2ElvVZM7RL9ROBewdSNkxCiZjGfus564cIobqrj8FLJnYldZgtYKok16 Hq/uwQKEv1GeK4rW6EiFBwC1hLhTWAYHeio3HV6YTO06vCvqwHLzecQ1nTRLWzjCJzHGch5vTXf 30l9tgx+xImx9oJDwAVo9Wz0r6TPJUbnXXTM1nOtVjwT2ln4gBoqc8tFwH8itQqBeOXe7GMENgM fiXBn3mD014p87kobkZwwDTn4FHjPgIV+TFtO2QINZpod9B6xR5V5MrEYpl0MV+LliZxBJQMq5G G/ZpEca/sS6W8WUEETHR2xO7iRDjZpQKlvwu9UmV3rjbJWEmvQWzsghOkk1kG3jsRKItLSiCh84 86O+KGmfBJJO/n5M1pDmo6ZwpnbTnZ/L/PoAQaHM9B4+Sl6+WHakEGCObRQpJqYMJn4HZidfHj2 TUQsLmbYoBPDkfzBkrNagoxKLvI2eL8Hbt8nEqOrXD6YVrofGKD3aCY/zTTVyPYXKMyhwoZcu45 vITUzsJS1n4mcFDwVaL4/inhXPSPlql X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:8006:b0:5e9:6d96:a910 with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-5e96da64d4emr837634e0c.3.1792000159744; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hiagonb ([2804:14c:4c5:8bf0::33ca]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71dfb90a1353d-5e91cbf5d1fsm11720814e0c.14.2026.10.14.10.49.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:49:15 -0300 From: Hiago De Franco To: Chen Wang , Inochi Amaoto Cc: Chen-Yu Yeh , sophgo@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sophgo: add cv1800b ethernet support overlay Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: sophgo@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6067ebd6-83a3-4ba5-86c9-a66c3348f8e4@linux.dev> Hi Chen, Inochi, On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 10:37:01AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote: > Hello, Hiago, > > Oops, it looks like I missed your patch. Yours was for the Duo, while > Chen-yu's was for the Duo 256M [1]; I conflated the two and ended up > submitting only the one for Duo 256M [2]. > > Since we are very close to the merge window now, I don't plan to submit any > further PRs, so your Duo patch will have to wait for the next cycle—I'm very > sorry about that. > > Could I trouble you to rebase and submit a new version after 7.4-rc1 is > released (this also serves as a reminder for us)? We will then include it in > the PR for 7.5. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20261005093749.645014-1-chenyou910331@gmail.com/ > link > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/sophgo/aff6ff25-8969-4a35-9543-9113afb2e003@linux.dev/ > link > > I've removed some people from the email's "To" list, keeping only the > relevant parties to avoid disturbing too many people. no worries, all good from my side. I will rebase and submit again a new version after 7.4-rc1 is out. > > Regards, > > Chen > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 03:56:02PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > Hi Chen, > > Instead of taking this patch, I wonder whether it can be converted to a > generic DT overlay file for all the supported boards, so we won't needed > to merge many duplicated patch for it. thanks for the idea. I can think about that, but in this case the other overlay for 256M is already on linux-riscv/for-next, so after 7.4-rc1 is out I can think about merging both overlays into only one file. > > Regards, > Inochi Best regards, -- Hiago