From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>, "David Wei" <dw@davidwei.uk>,
"Pavel Begunkov" <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
"Taehee Yoo" <ap420073@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Kaiyuan Zhang" <kaiyuanz@google.com>,
"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
"Kaifeng Wang" <kaifengw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/4] net: devmem: unmap dma_buf synchronously on queue uninstall
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:33:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as-uBvRisS7HxLHJ@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012174300.2338784-2-almasrymina@google.com>
On 10/12, Mina Almasry wrote:
> When a bound net_device is unregistered while userspace still holds a
> netlink or TCP socket reference on a devmem binding,
> mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall() clears binding->dev to NULL so
> netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy() will not touch the unregistered
> net_device, but leaves the dma_buf attachment mapped until
> __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free() runs later on socket close.
>
> Because dma_buf_attach() does not take a reference on dma_dev, device
> removal frees dma_dev while the attachment is still mapped. Closing the
> netlink socket afterwards triggers a slab use-after-free in
> dma_unmap_sg_attrs():
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dma_unmap_sg_attrs+0x76/0x2b0
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810fae64b0 by task kworker/3:1/53
> Workqueue: events __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free
> Call Trace:
> dma_unmap_sg_attrs+0x76/0x2b0
> unmap_udmabuf+0x8e/0x100
> dma_buf_unmap_attachment+0x145/0x330
> dma_buf_unmap_attachment_unlocked+0x96/0x130
> __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free+0x156/0x2e0
> Freed by task 9:
> kfree+0x1b8/0x550
> nsim_bus_dev_release+0xe/0x60
> device_release+0xcf/0x250
>
> Add net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_unmap() serialized under binding->lock
> and null out binding->sgt and binding->attachment after unmapping so
> unmapping is idempotent across queue uninstall and deferred binding
> destruction. Call it synchronously when the last bound RX queue is
> uninstalled in mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall(), except when a leased
> queue is unleased: the physical device is still registered and, if
> restarting its queue failed, may still be using the binding.
>
> The same use-after-free happens when the netlink socket is closed
> before the device is removed but RX tokens or the pending release work
> keep the binding alive. Such bindings are no longer installed on any
> queue and were already erased from net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings. Keep
> bindings in net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings until they are freed, hide
> unbound ones from TX lookups with an xarray mark, and on
> NETDEV_UNREGISTER clear binding->dev of unbound RX bindings for the
> device and unmap them, unless the device is a virtual device leasing
[..]
> queues, for the same reason as above. net_devmem_lock serializes that
> walk with the final free.
Can you explain net_devmem_lock a bit more? In
net_devmem_dev_unregister, why can you not net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf and
then rely on the binding->lock? The rest looks good, but the
new lock seems a bit excessive?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 17:42 [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: devmem: fix RX and TX binding teardown on device unregistration Mina Almasry
2026-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] net: devmem: unmap dma_buf synchronously on queue uninstall Mina Almasry
2026-10-13 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-14 6:49 ` Mina Almasry
2026-10-14 16:33 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-10-14 17:41 ` Mina Almasry
2026-10-14 20:52 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] net: devmem: detach TX bindings on NETDEV_UNREGISTER Mina Almasry
2026-10-13 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 17:42 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] netdevsim: support devmem RX and TX bindings Mina Almasry
2026-10-13 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 17:43 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] selftests: net: add devmem RX and TX netdev unregister tests Mina Almasry
2026-10-13 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:14 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-14 12:28 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-10-14 12:33 ` [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: devmem: fix RX and TX binding teardown on device unregistration Dragos Tatulea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as-uBvRisS7HxLHJ@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaifengw@google.com \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.