All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	<michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>, <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>,
	<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
	<rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:43:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as1GdJaxrmUbgkGU@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010090718.68308-2-raag.jadav@intel.com>

On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 02:36:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Currently, xe_gt_declare_wedged() stops GuC CT and initiates exec queue
> teardown synchronously. This can result in tdr timeout in cases where
> the device is declared wedged while jobs are still in-flight.
> 
> Introduce a worker for GT specific wedge handling and queue the teardown
> on GT ordered workqueue, so we don't disrupt the scheduler while jobs
> are still in-flight.
> 
> While at it, introduce for_each_initialized_gt() macro and use it for
> wedging GT. This helps avoid races in case the device is declared wedged
> in probe sequence before GT is initialized.
> 
> Fixes: c9474b726b93 ("drm/xe: Wedge the entire device")
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

> ---
> v2: Split fixes into separate patches (Rodrigo, Michal)
> v4: Introduce for_each_initialized_gt() (Michal)
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h   |  4 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c       | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h |  9 +++++++++
>  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 8392c9fad3c4..22ae10958d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe)
>  			    WEDGED_URL, XE_BUG_URL);
>  	}
>  
> -	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> +	for_each_initialized_gt(gt, xe, id)
>  		xe_gt_declare_wedged(gt);
>  
>  	if (xe_device_wedged(xe)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 83d6dafab53c..9b09e627af8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ static inline bool xe_device_uc_enabled(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	for_each_gt((gt__), (tile__)->xe, (id__)) \
>  		for_each_if((gt__)->tile == (tile__))
>  
> +#define for_each_initialized_gt(gt__, xe__, id__) \
> +	for_each_gt((gt__), (xe__), (id__)) \
> +		for_each_if((gt__)->initialized)
> +
>  static inline struct xe_force_wake *gt_to_fw(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  {
>  	return &gt->pm.fw;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 775c826b68b4..d762158c0777 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static void xe_gt_enable_comp_1wcoh(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  }
>  
>  static void gt_reset_worker(struct work_struct *w);
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w);
>  
>  static int emit_job_sync(struct xe_exec_queue *q, struct xe_bb *bb,
>  			 long timeout_jiffies, bool force_reset)
> @@ -706,6 +707,8 @@ static void xe_gt_fini(void *arg)
>  	struct xe_gt *gt = arg;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	disable_work_sync(&gt->wedge.worker);
> +
>  	if (disable_work_sync(&gt->reset.worker))
>  		/*
>  		 * If gt_reset_worker was halted from executing, take care of
> @@ -725,6 +728,7 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&gt->reset.worker, gt_reset_worker);
> +	INIT_WORK(&gt->wedge.worker, gt_wedge_worker);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i) {
>  		gt->ring_ops[i] = xe_ring_ops_get(gt, i);
> @@ -769,6 +773,8 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  			return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Must be last */
> +	gt->initialized = true;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1010,6 +1016,14 @@ void xe_gt_reset_async(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>  }
>  
> +static void gt_wedge_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct xe_gt *gt = container_of(w, typeof(*gt), wedge.worker);
> +
> +	xe_uc_declare_wedged(&gt->uc);
> +	xe_tlb_inval_reset(&gt->tlb_inval);
> +}
> +
>  void xe_gt_suspend_prepare(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  {
>  	xe_uc_suspend_prepare(&gt->uc);
> @@ -1200,6 +1214,5 @@ void xe_gt_declare_wedged(struct xe_gt *gt)
>  {
>  	xe_gt_assert(gt, gt_to_xe(gt)->wedged.mode);
>  
> -	xe_uc_declare_wedged(&gt->uc);
> -	xe_tlb_inval_reset(&gt->tlb_inval);
> +	queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, &gt->wedge.worker);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> index 628911346455..c00a7c171f80 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
> @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ struct xe_gt {
>  		struct work_struct worker;
>  	} reset;
>  
> +	/** @wedge: state for GT wedge */
> +	struct {
> +		/** @wedge.worker: worker for GT wedge to be done async */
> +		struct work_struct worker;
> +	} wedge;
> +
>  	/** @tlb_inval: TLB invalidation state */
>  	struct xe_tlb_inval tlb_inval;
>  
> @@ -419,6 +425,9 @@ struct xe_gt {
>  
>  	/** @eu_stall: EU stall counters subsystem per gt info */
>  	struct xe_eu_stall_gt *eu_stall;
> +
> +	/** @initialized: GT is initialized */
> +	bool initialized;
>  };
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-10  9:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] drm/xe/gt: Use GT ordered workqueue for wedging Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 20:43   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2026-10-10  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/xe: Move xe_device_wedged_fini() registration to xe_device_probe_early() Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/xe: Make xe_device_declare_wedged() IRQ safe Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:09   ` Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] drm/xe: Introduce xe_wedge Raag Jadav
2026-10-12 20:46   ` Matthew Brost
2026-10-10  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] drm/xe/ras: Move xe_ras_process_errors() to xe_ras Raag Jadav
2026-10-10  9:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10  9:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Introduce xe_wedge (rev3) Patchwork
2026-10-10  9:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-10-10 10:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-10 11:29 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as1GdJaxrmUbgkGU@gsse-cloud1.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
    --cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.